anti-Christ

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I don't get it. Please elaborate.

Yawn. You're obviously not on a seeing-things-for-what-they-actually-are mission here; you are, instead, on a cover-someone's-back-come-what-may mission. It's blatantly obvious.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Off to work in my non psychiatrist job. Pick this up later.

I wonder if she will go back and delete the post.

-Removed-

I think the claim is extremely unlikely. Only Suzianne could explain her (non-delusional) reasons for believing what she does.

@fmf said
Yawn. You're obviously not on a seeing-things-for-what-they-actually-are mission here; you are, instead, on a cover-someone's-back-come-what-may mission. It's blatantly obvious.

If it was blatantly obvious you would elaborate as requested, rather than obfuscating.

-Removed-

Team meetings are on a Wednesday.

-Removed-

No. It's because I'm not a qualified psychiatrist. Clients are referred to our service when they are already 'in the system' and have a diagnosis.....Obviously.

Edit: FMF says I'm not a 'professional' and yourself that I'm 'not qualified.' You are both incorrect. I am a mental health professional and I am qualified for the work I do in mental health. (This work does not involve diagnosing people or prescribing medication).

@ghost-of-a-duke said
If it was blatantly obvious you would elaborate as requested, rather than obfuscating.

You are taking the piss, I think.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
That one of her sparring partners was a navy seal? Is that the cat?

Bottom of page 25. Not about some navy SEAL. Not about whatever you mean by "the cat".

@fmf said
Bottom of page 25. Not about some navy SEAL. Not about whatever you mean by "the cat".

Because she affirms that what she said at the time was factual to her (what she said, not what you claim she said) this is damning evidence that she was/is delusional?

I have myself in the past been totally convinced about something, only later to discover I was mistaken. - Did that make me delusional,...or are you perhaps incorrectly using the term?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Because she affirms that what she said at the time was factual to her (what she said, not what you claim she said) this is damning evidence that she was/is delusional?

I have myself in the past been totally convinced about something, only later to discover I was mistaken. - Did that make me delusional,...or are you perhaps incorrectly using the term?

It would seem that the meaning of what was said is too nuanced for you.