16 Oct '05 22:26>1 edit
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressYou are welcome!
Ok, thanks. Haven't heard that one before. 🙂
Its like "Those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones"..
Another favourite 🙂
Originally posted by aardvarkhomeSo you think thats worse than Saddam killing hundreds of thousands
Which state currently lead by a fundamentalist has armed forces currently occupying significant holy cities of another religion?
Hmm, let me think, three words, first begins with U......second begins with S.......anyone got it yet?
Originally posted by PeachyWhy don't you tell that to the Taliban? I didn't see them as exactly
Such aggression is against Islamic Law. I personally condemn this act, and don’t consider it part of Islam, or the message that Islam brings. There is a very well known verse in the Quran that roughly translate: “There is no force in religion”. We respect Christianity and Judaism and shouldn’t be raging a war against our brothers of the Book.
Such act only pollutes the name of Islam and all its peaceful message.
Originally posted by PeachyIt means he considers the US and Britain to be equally at blame for
Thank you for that site, brings the topic into conclusion.
"And which pot is calling which kettle black" means that pots and kettles are alike,
both burnt black, both in the same boat. One can't attack the other for both have the
same defect.
Originally posted by sonhouseWhy all the hostility? Nobody thinks that the atrocities you mentioned are ok. As long as there are places in the world where these kinds of things happen we are not going to have peace.
It means he considers the US and Britain to be equally at blame for
the offenses against Islam.
I think it was a useless war, Bush should have been concentrating
all his efforts on Bin Laden, the known criminal in the 9-11 attacks.
Instead he goes after a minor player he knew he could whip.
Problem is the insurgents, over 15000 of them, mainly from Ira ...[text shortened]... eople? Was that an acceptable consequence
of having Muslims rule Muslims? I would like to know.
Originally posted by The Chess ExpressThank you for your thoughtfull reply. I am sorry if it looked hostile.
Why all the hostility? Nobody thinks that the atrocities you mentioned are ok. As long as there are places in the world where these kinds of things happen we are not going to have peace.
The only way these things are going to end though is if there is a world effort. A handful of countries cannot do what the world needs to do. America would nev ...[text shortened]... peace when the major countries act in the interest of the world and not just their own country.