@fmf saidDo I know a particular celebrity because I believe the "narratives" about them in the newspapers and magazines?
When you talk about "knowing God", all you are saying is that you believe the narratives in the Bible are true.
Of course not! I only know "about" him or her because of what I hear or read.
@fmf saidThat is an obfuscation, and makes little or no sense.
Whether he actually exists or not has no bearing on your belief in what the Bible says about him.
I'm not making an argument for the existence of God. I'm simple pointing out that there's a difference between just knowing about God and actually knowing God.
Better yet known by God.
@josephw saidNo, there isn't. I am fully aware, from personal experience, of how faith makes believers think there is some special extra substance to "knowing God". It's just a religious creed that you have internalized. Faith is a function of cognition and comprises a set of complicated interdependent opinions about oneself and the universe.
I'm simple pointing out that there's a difference between just knowing about God and actually knowing God.
@fmf said"...faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."
No, there isn't. I am fully aware, from personal experience, of how faith makes believers think there is some special extra substance to "knowing God". It's just a religious creed that you have internalized. Faith is a function of cognition and comprises a set of complicated interdependent opinions about oneself and the universe.
You are unknowingly equating faith with cognition, which is a mistake. You think if you're not cognitively aware of something it doesn't exist.
You lack the "substance" of true spirituality because there's no evidence of faith in your cognitive function.
You have nothing to prove, only a spurious set of narratives with which to attempt to disprove something you don't know is real or not.
@fmf saidYou think it's sophistry because you refuse to accept as valid the biblical narratives.
I am willing to accept that you self-identify as a Christian but the whole idea that belief in the Christian God is NOT a religion is just a kind of sophistry.
Try reason and logic. Christianity is not a religion because religion is defined by the practice of rites and rituals designed by man for the purpose of putting man in a state of right standing with God.
You're missing some vital information. God needs nothing from man. Man has nothing to give to God. Especially not man made religious institutions.
Whether you understand what I'm saying or not you'll proceed to gloss over the point.
@josephw saidReligions are defined by their scriptures ~ and religious beliefs are defined by the narratives laid out in those scriptures. These narratives result in specific beliefs about the God figures at the centre of those religions. The same goes for Christianity. To try to argue that Christianity - and the beliefs attendant thereto - are somehow not a religion is weak and strange.
Christianity is not a religion because religion is defined by the practice of rites and rituals designed by man for the purpose of putting man in a state of right standing with God.