Originally posted by knightmeister
I'm not against Bert. I like the fellow. I think it's a lucid point he is making . It is absurd if there is nothing more to this world than physical laws , cosmic dice and determinism. He was one step away from theism , he just didn't know it.
Here's the ironic thing.
Bertrand Russell was a not-quite-great philosopher. And he knew this. But in many ways he is the greatest example a not-great-at-all philosopher could follow. Why? Because he had massive intellectual curiousity. Throughout his life he was receptive to new ideas. He was rigorous in his thought. He loved clarity. And above all, he was - perhaps more than any other not-quite-great philosopher - prepared to admit he was wrong, and to start again, as (in his view) the arguments and evidence demanded.
Now, you're a not-great-at-all philosopher (no shame in this - I'm in this category, along with >99.999 per cent of others.) And yet you have no intellectual curiousity whatsoever. You're not receptive to new ideas. You are not rigorous in your thought. You constantly miss or avoid the point. Above all, you are simply incapable of admitting you are wrong - even on something like this, where if you simply read the essay (the link has been provided above), it would be perfectly obvious how the quote fits in.
You are one giant step away from Russell, and in the wrong direction; and not only do you not know it, but you never will.
As such - as far as anyone with any degree of intellectual honesty and curiousity about the universe is concerned - you are a recruiting sergeant for atheism.