31 Jan '14 15:16>
Originally posted by RJHindsRJ there was a reason that i started this text in the first place. Plainly, one man, Martin Luther, disagreed with the scripture in his time. So he argues with the church, well so what about that. But does he have the right to change the bible just because he doesn't agree with it? Changed it by removing books. And yes i know he didn't do the actual removal, but through his influence other men did.
Luther translated the New Testament into German to make it more accessible to the commoners and to erode the influence of priests. He used the recent critical Greek edition of Erasmus, a text which was later called Textus Receptus.
Luther chose to omit the portions of the Old Testament found in the Greek Septuagint, but not in the Hebrew Masoretic texts t ...[text shortened]... all Protestants.
The Reformation-Martin Luther
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFqWnEpZvjs
Later the JW's come along and change it to fit their beliefs as well
And the Methodists too have deleted portions of it.
And if i recall there is a new translation (maybe not so new now) that has omitted some 4000 words.
So the question remains, do we have the right to change and omit parts of the bible to fit our desires and needs?