divegeester,
Duchess64 is expressing what she knows about "intersex people" in a way that involves trying very hard to tear you a new one in a highly personalized way at the same time.
Which is the main thing Duchess64 is engaged in here, do you think? Expressing what she knows about "intersex people"? Or trying very hard to tear you a new one in a highly personalized way?
divegeester,
Duchess64 is now expressing what she thinks about my response to the way she explained what she knows about "intersex people" while at the same time trying very hard to tear you a new one in a highly personalized way. What is the main thing Duchess64 is engaged in here, do you think? Talking about "intersex people" for the purposes of discourse on the matter? Or is the main thing she is doing is to try very hard to tear both you and me new ones in a highly personalized way, regardless of the topic?
The post that was quoted here has been removedWhy didn't you simply explain to him, and indeed to everyone who was unclear about it, that conflating intersex people with homosexual people is a mistake?
How does making an assertion about divegeester's supposed "abysmal ignorance" and asserting that he is a "troll" help you make your explanation about intersex people?
@fmf said@duchess64
If you perceive that divegeester is "attacking" you, why are you "attacking" him back? You either think that "attacking" people is wrong, or you don't.
You may run away from this by all means.
@fmf said@duchess64
Are you opposed to people using "ridicule" in their posts?
Run away from this too. It's your prerogative.
The post that was quoted here has been removedI don't see why you exhibiting your knowledge or viewpoint, and your correction of other people's errors or the deficit in what they know, seemingly always has to be packaged in such a personally abusive way, especially when almost no one on this website has as fragile a glass chin as you do when it comes to perceived [and even imagined] slights. It's baffling.