25 Feb '08 22:57>
Originally posted by snowinscotlandDon't get too excited. He said he believed.
Halleleuja brother!
Originally posted by MexicoYou need to me more exact.
O.k. as I said before I'm not here to defend evolutionary theory in anyway, but if you want a definition of what I mean by it:
Evolution is the process of life changing, over periods of time which vary dependent on the life form in question, due to environmental factors, and a bunch of other circumstances which I'm not going to get into because I'm trying ...[text shortened]... There is some controversy over the various mechanisms driving it, and the implications of it.
Originally posted by MexicoNow wait, are you saying each thing is changing due to the reasons
O.k. as I said before I'm not here to defend evolutionary theory in anyway, but if you want a definition of what I mean by it:
Evolution is the process of life changing, over periods of time which vary dependent on the life form in question, due to environmental factors, and a bunch of other circumstances which I'm not going to get into because I'm trying ...[text shortened]... st do it to each others work. Poking holes without an alternative, and that bugs me too.....
Originally posted by twhiteheadI agree his details are not very well defined.
You need to me more exact.
1. The process normally called 'evolution' can apply to non-living things too, including virus' and computer programs.
2. There is a distinct difference between:
A: Evolution is happening today.
B: Evolution is the explanation for life as we know it, and all life evolved from single cellular or simpler organisms.
Many peo ...[text shortened]... ent genetic makeup from itself results in the organisms species having evolved by definition.
Originally posted by KellyJayA: Evolution is happening today.
I agree his details are not very well defined.
Kelly
edit:
I can say I accept A and not B but agree with what he said.
Originally posted by KellyJayHow broad is your "give us a larger variety of" theory?
Now wait, are you saying each thing is changing due to the reasons
you have given from microscopic bacteria to trees and so on? That
can be true and still mean more than a few things, I can say I
completely agree with that statement and still disagree with what
someone else says when they too say they completely agree with that
statement! It depends ho ...[text shortened]... the process and disagree with how
much credit we can give it for the life we see today.
Kelly
Originally posted by PenguinSorry I quoted the wrong person......
A: Evolution is happening today.
B: Evolution is the explanation for life as we know it, and all life evolved from single cellular or simpler organisms.
Then I think the question being posed is 'do you have another theory, other than the theory of evolution by natural selection, that explains life as we know it, and that is scientific enough to b ...[text shortened]...
I may expand this post when I get to a powerpoint to plug the laptop back in!
--- Penguin.
Originally posted by timebombtedCould everyone please stop defending evolution, if you read the first post thats not the point of this thread...... sorry but if everyone keeps going for aggressive defense they get more small arguments going and evade the major question.....
How broad is your "give us a larger variety of" theory?
Can the 1st dog give us all the dogs
Can the 1st primate give us all the primates
Can the 1st mammal give us all the mammals
Can the 1st tetrapod give us all the tetrapods
Can the 1st vertebrate give us all the vertebrates
Can the 1st chordate give us all the chordates
Can the first multi cellular life give us all multi cellular life
??
Originally posted by serigadoWell argued timebombted........ Sorry for giving out I just don't want my question sidestepped and this turned into yet another defense of evolution..... As to my patients, I'd quite like to be made a saint actually, the Irony would be quite amusing.... First Atheist saint..... Hahahah...
Mexico, are you trying to get yourself canonized? You have the patience of a saint, I must admit...
There's some really good creationist stuff backed up by scientific evidence to support their claims. It's really well elaborated.
Originally posted by timebombtedCan the first cell give us all the cellular life...
How broad is your "give us a larger variety of" theory?
Can the 1st dog give us all the dogs
Can the 1st primate give us all the primates
Can the 1st mammal give us all the mammals
Can the 1st tetrapod give us all the tetrapods
Can the 1st vertebrate give us all the vertebrates
Can the 1st chordate give us all the chordates
Can the first multi cellular life give us all multi cellular life
??
Originally posted by AThousandYoungPlease please please stop defending evolution here, you just give them something else to play semantics with..... Which isn't the point of the thread.....
Can the first cell give us all the cellular life...
Can the first DNA give us all the DNA based life...
Originally posted by timebombtedYou believe that is less likely than non-living material becoming
How broad is your "give us a larger variety of" theory?
Can the 1st dog give us all the dogs
Can the 1st primate give us all the primates
Can the 1st mammal give us all the mammals
Can the 1st tetrapod give us all the tetrapods
Can the 1st vertebrate give us all the vertebrates
Can the 1st chordate give us all the chordates
Can the first multi cellular life give us all multi cellular life
??
Originally posted by MexicoDefine evolution please and this time say what you mean! Not some
Please please please stop defending evolution here, you just give them something else to play semantics with..... Which isn't the point of the thread.....