1. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    18 May '14 18:021 edit
    Originally posted by JS357
    It can be expressed exactly in base pi, in which case it is 10. Right?

    In any base, the base is expressible as 10. I think.🙄
    Yes, so both of us know the exact value of pi in base pi.

    For another interesting irrational base see:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio_base#Representing_irrational_numbers_of_note_as_golden_ratio_base_numbers
  2. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    18 May '14 18:05
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    And that is the problem. There is no such thing as using exactly an infinite number of digits.
    Its like saying 'you could count to infinity if you counted all the integers'. Its incoherent because there is not actual number called 'infinity'.
    No - not an exact number of digits, but an exact value of pi.
  3. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    18 May '14 18:09
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    No - not an exact number of digits, but an exact value of pi.
    I think the question then is what do you mean by 'expressed'?
  4. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    18 May '14 18:48
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    Just a thought.
    Surely omnipotence cannot be extended to changing universal truths?
    The last I heard the computers are still working on calculating what is the value of pi.
  5. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    18 May '14 19:21
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    No, universal truths, are by definition, universally true. You might argue that the value of pi is not a universal truth, but you cannot claim that universal truths are changeable.
    And the value of pi possibly depends on certain axioms but not on cosmic circumstances, so it is not changeable in extreme cosmic circumstances.
    If the axioms are false, then ...[text shortened]... t rather solely on definitions. So it may not even be a 'truth' at all, but rather a definition.
    Well there is one hitch in all that: IF we live in a multiverse there may be versions of our universe with slightly different laws of physics, like the difference between mass of proton Vs electron or some such or the gravitational constant. If G changes circles might change since you do circles in space time. If spacetime is somehow different there PI COULD change a bit.

    Besides, this being could play with the digits 10 trillion away from the first 9 or so and have not one whit of difference in practical outcomes.
  6. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    18 May '14 19:44
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    The last I heard the computers are still working on calculating what is the value of pi.
    You heard wrong.
  7. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    18 May '14 19:52
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    If G changes circles might change since you do circles in space time.
    As already pointed out, we do not do circles in spacetime. We do them in Euclidian geometry. It is already the case that circles in spacetime do not have a circumference of 2*pi*r^2 as spacetime is not flat. Similarly, triangles in space time do not have angles that add up to 180 degrees.

    If spacetime is somehow different there PI COULD change a bit.
    Pi is a mathematical constant, not a physical constant. As already pointed out, it is obtainable from certain sequences. Those sequences have nothing whatsoever to do with the specific spacetime we live in.

    Besides, this being could play with the digits 10 trillion away from the first 9 or so and have not one whit of difference in practical outcomes.
    The discrepancy between circles in space time and Euclidean circles is quite a bit more significant than that - depending of course where you measure. Near a black hole it gets really significant.
  8. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    18 May '14 20:36
    We could of couse just use Tau instead:
    YouTube&index=2&list=PL5F03A9D6D278C5D9
  9. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    18 May '14 21:33

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  10. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    18 May '14 21:33
    Originally posted by divegeester
    Leaving aside the god element, why is the value of pi a universal truth? Aren't universal "truths" changeable in extreme cosmic circumstances.
    That is the question I am asking.

    You could propose that universal constants like the cosmological constant, G or electron charge.

    But I don't see how pi can be changed. It isn't a physical thing is it?
  11. Standard memberAgerg
    The 'edit'or
    converging to it
    Joined
    21 Aug '06
    Moves
    11479
    18 May '14 22:261 edit
    Originally posted by JS357
    Related question: does an omniscient being know the exact numeric value of pi? (Say, in base 10.)

    BTW, most people think of pi in its geometric sense but it is also the numeric value of a mathematical series expansion. More than one series expansion, actually.

    Here's one: PI/4 = 1/1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + ...

    or PI = 4(1/1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + ...)

    alternating + and - and using odd integers.

    http://math2.org/math/constants/pi.htm
    But isn't that derivation of pi obtained through Fourier series expansion which of course involves sines and cosines, the values of which dependent of the basic geometry of circles!?

    (Been too damned long since I actually did any of that stuff - oh how I miss the good old days of uni 🙁 )
  12. Unknown Territories
    Joined
    05 Dec '05
    Moves
    20408
    18 May '14 22:46
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    Which one did you fix?
    The value of the unit
    Or the size of the dix?
  13. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    18 May '14 23:42
    Originally posted by Agerg
    But isn't that derivation of pi obtained through Fourier series expansion which of course involves sines and cosines, the values of which dependent of the basic geometry of circles!?

    (Been too damned long since I actually did any of that stuff - oh how I miss the good old days of uni 🙁 )
    Well the problem I see is that you have to use the exact values of irrationals like 1/3 and 1/7 to calculate it. Maybe that says the same thing.
  14. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    18 May '14 23:51
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    Just a thought.
    Surely omnipotence cannot be extended to changing universal truths?
    What kind of pi? I love banana cream. Why on earth would anyone want to change it? 😠
  15. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    19 May '14 06:28
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    You heard wrong.
    I figured it was a waste.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree