Go back
Can one have a correct opinion on Abiogensis?

Can one have a correct opinion on Abiogensis?

Spirituality

1 edit

@kellyjay said
I have it on good authority the math belongs to "Ghost of a Duke", well maybe not good authority, kind of almost trustworthy authority, well not really almost trustworthy authority, I'd say it really wasn't even an authority and not at all trustworthy. Come to think of it, it may have actually been Ghost of a Duke who said it was his, and he was asking for money to do some equations for me. 🙂
You have been citing "2+2 = 4" as an example of a "truth" that you believe in that you think somehow makes your belief in the "truth" your God figure more compelling, right? You are asserting that the "truth" your God figure's existence is just as "self-evident" as the truth of "2+2 = 4", yes?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@eladar said
Logic can only be applied once assumptions are made. From my point of view I have not lost a single argument in internet forums. I am sure there are many with similar beliefs about their arguments.
And if there were, they'd be just as wrong as you.

1 edit

@wolfgang59 said
LOGIC does not belong to anyone.

You may as well dispute 2+2=4 with "whose MATH?"
Atheism cannot account for the existence of logic to start off with in a world with no absolutes. You’re piggybacking that off theism.


@suzianne said
And if there were, they'd be just as wrong as you.
Takes a strong person to chime in just to say "you are wrong".

You make my point perfectly.


@eladar said
Why do you bother asking me anything? I am done with you.
The implication of the question I asked dismantles the point you thought you were making. That's why.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@eladar said
Science says you do not need to have the beginning of life just a beginning of the universe in the big bang.

Evolution takes place after life starts but life does not need to start. Silly all you need is a big bang then magically appearing life then evolution and we know this is all fact backed by science...magic and all.
Why isn't some big bearded guy in the sky "magic"? Is creating a woman out of a rib "science"?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@dj2becker said
Atheism cannot account for the existence of logic to start off with in a world with no absolutes. You’re piggybacking that off theism.
You believe LOGIC is dependent upon THEISM?

2 edits

@wolfgang59 said
You believe LOGIC is dependent upon THEISM?
Do tell how time plus matter plus random chance gets you LOGIC. I have all day.

If you as an atheist think you can present a logical reason how your worldview can account for the abstract laws of logic, be my guest.


@wolfgang59 said
You believe LOGIC is dependent upon THEISM?
I believe God created the universe and its run on predictable manners for a cause, and our reasoning also comes from God. You think a universe without cause could be so finely tuned?


@kellyjay said
I believe God created the universe and its run on predictable manners for a cause, and our reasoning also comes from God. You think a universe without cause could be so finely tuned?
How is it "tuned"?


@kellyjay said
I believe God created the universe and its run on predictable manners for a cause, and our reasoning also comes from God. You think a universe without cause could be so finely tuned?
It’s fascinating how some people think adding more time to the equation suddenly solves the problem. Garbage in always equals garbage out.


@vivify said
Why isn't some big bearded guy in the sky "magic"? Is creating a woman out of a rib "science"?
You can not debate assumptiins only try to belittle assumptions you disagree with. Thank you for making my point.


@eladar said
You can not debate assumptiins only try to belittle assumptions you disagree with. Thank you for making my point.
You think that your assumptions protect you from debate?


Why try to explain things to arrogant people who have no understanding?

Internet debate means telling other people they are wrong. If you want to have a discussion based on logic then you must have shared assumptions. If you do not then all you have is internet debate as defined earlier.


@eladar said
Why try to explain things to arrogant people who have no understanding?

Internet debate means telling other people they are wrong. If you want to have a discussion based on logic then you must have shared assumptions. If you do not then all you have is internet debate as defined earlier.
In that case, why not take your unwillingness to debate to a Christian website where no one is looking for genuine discourse and everybody has more or less the same superstition-based "assumptions" as you do?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.