Originally posted by WulebgrReligion has not been hostile to science in the past. There have been isolated (and famously misguided) instances of hostility to science. The fundementals of science were established in universities which were, at the time, religious foundations
Reigion is not hostile to science. A Nun teaching in an all-girls Catholic high school secured funding for her students to produce DNA sequences in the study of osteoporosis. Check it out:
http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,69336,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1
Originally posted by aardvarkhomeIt seemed so promising from the title 😞
Religion has not been hostile to science in the past. There have been isolated (and famously misguided) instances of hostility to science. The fundementals of science were established in universities which were, at the time, religious foundations
Originally posted by aardvarkhomeSo would you say religion, and lets be blunt and say Christianity, is hostile to science only when it directly conflicts with religious dogma? Because I believe that's the point of the original post.
Religion has not been hostile to science in the past. There have been isolated (and famously misguided) instances of hostility to science. The fundementals of science were established in universities which were, at the time, religious foundations
Originally posted by wibis hostile to science only when it directly conflicts with religious dogma?
So would you say religion, and lets be blunt and say Christianity, is hostile to science only when it directly conflicts with religious dogma? Because I believe that's the point of the original post.
Well, sure, wib....but that covers a lot of territory.
Originally posted by ivangrice
It seemed so promising from the title 😞
I almost forgot which forum I was in at the time... 😲
