1 edit
Originally posted by STANGIsn't it just great being ignored... I post with the hope that you can still see reason and change your discussion/debating style of ignoring the opposition's point and jumping up and down beating your chest like a caveman, reiterating ad nausium your own unfounded and preconceived assumptions.
No ?
Originally posted by HalitoseYour posts and some others are similar so I have made general answers without quoting you or the others. Anyway, my point is that all religion is open to interpretation and Christians, like Bush, should get off their high horse.
Isn't it just great being ignored... I post with the hope that you can still see reason and change your discussion/debating style of ignoring the opposition's point and jumping up and down beating your chest like a caveman, reiterating ad nausium your own unfounded and preconceived assumptions.
If there is to be peace then there must be acknowledgement that there is no axis of evil nor alliance of goodness.
Originally posted by STANGWith all due respect: My advice to you is to shake out your little yin-yang mat and meditate on the beauty of Australian Outback before trying to sound philosophical in a spirituality thread -- it's just not working. Who are you anyway to question a man who you've never met -- or had an internet discussion with. It’s all so easy for you armchair critics -- rant against the ills of the world yet never lift a finger or suffer a little discomfort to change it. What are you doing to make life more livable for the poor, destitute and helpless of this world? What would you have done in Bush's post-9/11 shoes? Would your policies of appeasement have been any better than those of Neville Chamberlain on the eve of WWII? I'm not even American (never been there either) but I'm getting sick of your continual baseless assertions.
Your posts and some others are similar so I have made general answers without quoting you or the others. Anyway, my point is that all religion is open to interpretation and Christians, like Bush, should get off their high horse.
If there is to be peace then there must be acknowledgement that there is no axis of evil nor alliance of goodness.
Oh, by the way: If as you assert there is no good or evil – what exactly is your problem? Isn’t everything exactly as it should be – an orgiastic balance of pain and pleasure?
Originally posted by HalitoseWhy don't you argue with windmill in the debates forum. He's proposing Saddam should be shot.
Who are you anyway to question a man who you've never met -- or had an internet discussion with.
Bush had personal financial interests in oil and military equipment manufacturers. The claim that there were WMD's was a lie.
Originally posted by STANGBush had personal financial interests in oil and military equipment manufacturers.
Why don't you argue with windmill in the debates forum. He's proposing Saddam should be shot.
Bush had personal financial interests in oil and military equipment manufacturers. The claim that there were WMD's was a lie.
You must be a personal buddy of Michelle Moore. Do you have undisputable evidence to prove this? Could it not be possible at all that he was trying to oust the tyrant murderer who was slaughtering his own people? And perhaps introduce democracy into a war-torn and struggling nation?
The claim that there were WMD's was a lie.
Really? Were you part of Saddam's top secret absolute-annihilation-of-the-Kurds/Israelis/Iranians/Americans research groupie to be privy to such conclusive assertions? He certainly had the intention. He certainly had the time to destroy all proof once the war started. They could still be hidden in one of his secret underground bunkers for all you know. You must be one of those guys who took the Iraqi information minister at his word.
What am I doing? I'm going against my better judgment and humoring you to a discussion... please try not to disappoint and return to the age old defecation without representation.
Originally posted by Halitose"The International Commission of Inquiry on Crimes Against Humanity Committed by the Bush Administration has announced it will hold its second session of hearings on January 20-22, 2006. This session will continue the truly historic work of forging a powerful, comprehensive, and highly public case documenting what the Bush regime is doing to the people of the world".
What am I doing? I'm going against my better judgment and humoring you to a discussion... please try not to disappoint and return to the age old defecation without representation.