18 Apr '16 18:23>
Originally posted by vivifySo it's purpose is not to promote the gospel of Jesus Christ? It's just a business?
How do you expect them to keep a theme park running if they don't charge?
Originally posted by googlefudgeNo they don't. Please explain how what they believe is "radically different" to what I believe?To charge people to hear the Christian gospel is reprehensible, in my opinion.
Ahh, but it's not your Christian gospel, these people clearly believe in a radically different 'Christianity'
than the one you believe in. Which is why it's best to think of it [legally] as a separate religion, like
Scientology.
And if it is indeed a d ...[text shortened]... t is it legally that makes this clearly different from a church where discrimination is allowed?
Originally posted by divegeesterObviously, an evangelical organization named "Answers in Genesis" that regularly promotes creationism isn't opening a "Noah's Ark" theme park "just" for business.
So it's purpose is not to promote the gospel of Jesus Christ? It's just a business?
Originally posted by divegeesterMaybe this is merely a creative way to spread the Gospel? Something fun, rather than preaching on the street?
Christians. The good news of Jesus Christ and/or the powers of the spirit, should not be sold for profit. There is sound scripture supporting this. Ken Ham has lost his way.
Originally posted by divegeesterI have to agree with the first part of your statement. I am not read up on Ken Ham however so I don't really feel qualified to make a judgement.
Christians. The good news of Jesus Christ and/or the powers of the spirit, should not be sold for profit. There is sound scripture supporting this. Ken Ham has lost his way.
Originally posted by vivifyThis is not "fun" they are trying to raise 33,000,000. Wake up!
Maybe this is merely a creative way to spread the Gospel? Something fun, rather than preaching on the street?
By your logic, there should be no evangelical Christian music, books or movies available to the public, unless they're completely free.
Originally posted by yoctobyteThe gospel of Jesus Christ is so simple people cannot believe it, and it is so free people cannot buy it.
I have to agree with the first part of your statement. I am not read up on Ken Ham however so I don't really feel qualified to make a judgement.
This reminds me of books about the end of the world which come out every now and again. If the world is ending why sell a book, better to find a way to give it away thus impacting more people about the end then making a profit.
Originally posted by divegeesterOkay. Your personal beliefs aside, they are a Christian organization with the goal of spreading Christianity. That makes them a religious organization.
This is not "fun" they are trying to raise 33,000,000. Wake up!
That's right. I don't believe anything which promoted the gospel should be sold for money unless it's printing costs for the Bible, and even then it is questionable in terms of profit.
Originally posted by vivifyThan I ask you again, if they are "spreading the gospel" by means of the ark venture, why are they charging to hear it?
Okay. Your personal beliefs aside, they are a Christian organization with the goal of spreading Christianity. That makes them a religious organization.
Originally posted by vivifyIm not questioning there spectrum of motives, I'm questioning whether or not it is a for profit business. Clearly it is primarily a for profit business and therefore subject to business tax, employment laws and other corporate legislation. Do you not agree with this? Do you think they should be permitted to make millions of dollars in profit by charging people to get into a theme park and be allowed to hide behind a "religious" status?
Obviously, an evangelical organization named "Answers in Genesis" that regularly promotes creationism isn't opening a "Noah's Ark" theme park "just" for business.
Originally posted by divegeesterThat's a completely different topic. I already stated that I don't think religious organizations should get tax breaks. There's no reason for it. But as for if they should be allowed to profit: why not?
Im not questioning there spectrum of motives, I'm questioning whether or not it is a for profit business. Clearly it is primarily a for profit business and therefore subject to business tax, employment laws and other corporate legislation. Do you not agree with this? Do you think they should be permitted to make millions of dollars in profit by charging people to get into a theme park and be allowed to hide behind a "religious" status?