Christians and nuclear power

-Removed-

You can't stereotype over 2 billion Christians in the world in this way. They have many different views regarding nuclear power. This goes for Jews, Muslims, and others as well.

-Removed-

So you expect some things from us:

* Read the paper.
* develop the theological argument

while you just say you disagree. On what points do you disagree and why?

For me:

*theologically speaking the main argument is the stewardship, which is quite loosely defined in Colossians. The argument is of course void . If God can create a univers ex nihilo he can do it again. If the new ceration is without the evil, it is also without all the consequence of evil.

The "millions" of years of consequence is probably no shocker for any Christian expecting the end of the world "soon".

-Removed-

On a side note, while I’m waiting for mchill to arrive



Well, I have arrived. Please recall that you asked: Do Christians or other religious posters here think that nuclear power is not biblical or not morally acceptable? Personally, I don't give a hoot about nuclear power, but your question is valueless because in order to be valid, you'd have to poll a large number of Christians, or other religious people in order to gage how they really think about the subject.

I'm not trying to make you angry, but your question is irrelevant.

-Removed-

I did see them. They are so general however that one can't see the single argument.

Since the thread is called Christians and nuclear power I expected specific christian or theological arguments.
In my count only one was presented, the rather vague "Stewardship". This doesn't really hold water. So in the quoted paper there is no specific "christian" argumentation against nuclear power.

My opinion? I am against the use because of the single argument, that we shouldn't produce uclear waste if we have no idea what to do with it. (Not specific Christian I know)