Go back
Competitive Christianity

Competitive Christianity

Spirituality


Go!


@Arkturos said
Go!
You first. - I'll get your coat.


@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
You first. - I'll get your coat.
Only real Christians allowed to play. No heretics or schismatics. The Christians have to agree who the real Christians are.

I’ll get the popcorn.


@moonbus said
Only real Christians allowed to play. No heretics or schismatics. The Christians have to agree who the real Christians are.

I’ll get the popcorn.
I find competitive Christians require a non-competitive atheist to keep them morally grounded.


@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
I find competitive Christians require a non-competitive atheist to keep them morally grounded.
And often to explain their religion to them. In my experience, not one in a thousand can tell you what Apostolic Succession is or why it matters, and not one in ten thousand can tell you what “consubstantiality” means and how it affected world-historic events such as the division of Western Europe from Asia or how Russia came to assume the mantle when Constantinople fell to the Muslims.


@moonbus said
And often to explain their religion to them. In my experience, not one in a thousand can tell you what Apostolic Succession is or why it matters, and not one in ten thousand can tell you what “consubstantiality” means and how it affected world-historic events such as the division of Western Europe from Asia or how Russia came to assume the mantle when Constantinople fell to the Muslims.
And not one in three thousand can actually play a tambourine.


@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
And not one in three thousand can actually play a tambourine.
On the other hand, many are quite adept at venereal sins.


i sit cross-legged in the lotus
and lose the christian grand prix
by having lost, i come in first place
and claim the non-action trophy


@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
I find competitive Christians require a non-competitive atheist to keep them morally grounded.
Have you found one yet?

1 edit

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
You first. - I'll get your coat.
I'm just the event organizer.

Plus, it's Oakley blast-shutter time in Florida, and therefore not really coat weather.

Also, out of consideration for your well-documented sensitivities, perhaps this would be the wrong time to mention my footwear.


@moonbus said
And often to explain their religion to them. In my experience, not one in a thousand can tell you what Apostolic Succession is or why it matters, and not one in ten thousand can tell you what “consubstantiality” means and how it affected world-historic events such as the division of Western Europe from Asia or how Russia came to assume the mantle when Constantinople fell to the Muslims.
Yeah, no kidding (speaking as an "apostate" who only really began to understand Christianity years after I left the Church of Rome).


I am thinking this is a quasi-public thread, until that one public figure, as it would take, to enter and transform it.


@Arkturos said
Yeah, no kidding (speaking as an "apostate" who only really began to understand Christianity years after I left the Church of Rome).
When modern Christians (CHINOS--Christians in name only) find out what their religion actually requires of them, they often balk:

quote:

... multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in their preaching — "turn the other cheek" — [and] to have someone come up after to say, "Where did you get those liberal talking points?" And what was alarming to me is that in most of these scenarios, when the pastor would say, "I'm literally quoting Jesus Christ," the response would not be, "I apologize." The response would be, "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."

end quote

https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/15lxp6i/evangelicals_reject_the_sermon_on_the_mount_that/


@moonbus said
When modern Christians (CHINOS--Christians in name only) find out what their religion actually requires of them, they often balk:

quote:

... multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in their preaching — "turn the other cheek" — [and] to have someone come up after to say, "Where did you get those libera ...[text shortened]...
https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/15lxp6i/evangelicals_reject_the_sermon_on_the_mount_that/
You show a hate thread as truth and knowledge without examples or sources, good job.

1 edit

@mike69 said
You show a hate thread as truth and knowledge without examples or sources, good job.
https://baptistnews.com/article/when-liberal-talking-points-are-the-gospel/


Russell Moore, evangelical and editor-in-chief of Christianity Today.

You may apologize now.