Competitive Christianity

@mike69 said
And I choose not to argue with someone who knows nothing about me making assumptions and showing their hate and blindness of receiving and spreading propaganda activist crap…

@Suzianne said
Then don't come into these forums apparently siding with the voice of reason if you don't believe it in any way.

Why would you carve out a political strategem and then make posts like this trying to appear reasonable when you most assuredly are not?

@mike69 said
This is old and I don’t feel like looking the subject up again. You don’t see truth, you make judgements based off a reality of propaganda and activism. If you would actually like to play chess I would be happy to do so but argue with someone like this I’m not in the mood, I’m sorry you’re bored.

@Suzianne said
How about truth? Do you think truth is only an afterthought?

At the very least, live your own truth, however horrible that is.

Don't be wishy-washy.


All this reads like Donald Trump claiming to be a righteous Christian. It's clearly untrue. Why are you positing things you don't believe in?

1. For one the faith has continuity like a double cone. The Table of Nations (Gen. 10) is unlike any ancient ethnography in its family and tribal history. Modern believers aren't only taking up a position from Christ, they're grafted into the tree of Abraham. To this day practices of biblical betrothal, far from sowing discord, record the lion's share of such commemorations.
2. Potential Believer who doesn't accept the sign of the Jews---they could look to the Rosetta stone and the 1922 highly coincidental discovery of Tutankhamon. The message from 1400 B.C. is not perfectly zero eccentricity but it establishes a monotheistic accompaniment to the reign of Akhenaten, or Amenhotep IV, whose first wife was Nefertiti. Now there's competition .

If you don't follow that coincidence, another view from a leading theory is the origin of Indo-European languages in the Anatolian region. Same location that we know flourished after Noah landed the animals safely. The signs and wonders in nature are owed in many cases to subjective experience, rather than miraculous intervention, although still the purview of the supernatural.

@Suzianne said
I asked you a question.

The least you can do is answer it.

@Suzianne said
The ultimate hypocrisy.

@Suzianne said
Then don't come into these forums apparently siding with the voice of reason if you don't believe it in any way.

Why would you carve out a political strategem and then make posts like this trying to appear reasonable when you most assuredly are not?

If you're going to come in here with the attitude of the asshole and then argue that one shouldn't be an asshole, then yo ...[text shortened]... y other option is to NOT be a horrible human being and explain where this change of heart came from.

@Arkturos said
Just because you cannot help but reply to "every dog that barks" does not mean that everyone else must do the same.

@Suzianne said
And yet, here you are.

@Arkturos said
Only occasionally, Mz. Snippy.

@Suzianne said
And yet, here you are. Again.

@Arkturos said
P.S. -- Not that I'm holding court here, but why wouldn't I reply to this and that in a thread which I myself had started?

If you want to learn something from me, please just say so. Time is passing. Tick tock.