25 Jun '14 20:08>
Originally posted by RBHILLThat seems to answer all those naysayers. Great.
Cool: http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bNZEfafbjSE&feature=kp
Originally posted by karoly aczelIf you teach creationism from the Old Testament then you should say Judism only or also and Christian, Muslim, Catholicism, Mormonism, Jahovah Witness, and other groups that follow the Old Testament.
At my kids school they,ve re-worded their RE classes to say that they are strictly non-denomenational RELIGION.
It's not religion, it's Christianity and should be labelled appropriately
Originally posted by DeepThoughtYeah, it is very confusing in the UK and I don't understand it fully by any means. There's a lot of history and politics involved. There are certainly the following:
In the U.K. what you would call a private school is what we would call a public school. Essentially it is open to all members of the public whose parents can afford the fees. A private school in the U.K. on the other hand is not required to admit pupils who do not fulfil whatever other criteria they have for entrance.
Public schools are still subjec ...[text shortened]... didn't match GCSE's (exams taken at 16) well enough then people wouldn't send their kids there.
Originally posted by PenguinThey should also not be allowed to teach evolution as scientific fact, because it isn't. Then maybe more people would be happy not to fight the system.
Yeah, it is very confusing in the UK and I don't understand it fully by any means. There's a lot of history and politics involved. There are certainly the following:
Private schools
Public schools
State funded schools
Independent schools
Academies
Free Schools
Faith Schools
...
I think the gist of the latest regulations are that if you receive ...[text shortened]... x-payer than you cannot teach creationism as a scientific fact. Because it isn't.
--- Penguin