1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsWhich just proves you didn't hear a word he said.
Evolution is history's greatest hoax - Darwin theory is wrong
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpoFmjgFRQ0
Like we should really believe a word this dude says, talking with a bible in his hand. Gee, could it be he is a tiny bit biased? And I hear him say evolutionists believe in 'spontaneous generation' of life. Actually they don't have ANY view on the origin of life. They confine themselves to the study of life AFTER IT HAS ARRIVED AS WE KNOW IT and the fossils therein.
Right there, this proves that dude is just another politician spouting BS to sway people to his POV to build up votes to vote evolution out of science, a great way to do science.
Originally posted by sonhouseEVOLUTION EXPOSED: YOUNG EARTH & DINOSAURS PT.2/3
Which just proves you didn't hear a word he said.
Like we should really believe a word this dude says, talking with a bible in his hand. Gee, could it be he is a tiny bit biased? And I hear him say evolutionists believe in 'spontaneous generation' of life. Actually they don't have ANY view on the origin of life. They confine themselves to the study of li ...[text shortened]... people to his POV to build up votes to vote evolution out of science, a great way to do science.
Originally posted by RJHindsHere is a handy C++ program to calculate your IQ
Evolution is history's greatest hoax - Darwin theory is wrong
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpoFmjgFRQ0
#include <iostream>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main()
{
std::cout << "please enter your redhotpawn alias\n";
std::string name;
std::getline(std::cin, name);
unsigned char IQ = 100; //average intelligence
if ( name == "RJHinds" )
{
//start with large IQ since RJHinds is super-duper smart!
IQ = 256;
}
double factor = 0.6 + (rand() % 100) / (double)100;
IQ *= factor;
std::cout << "thanks " << name << ", we calculated your IQ to be: " << (int)IQ << "\n";
}
Hope this helps 🙂
- Joined
- 31 Aug 06
- Moves
- 40565
1 edit
Originally posted by sonhouseYou have to admit. There's a certain comedy value here:
What a joke. Where is the science paper this fat faced fuk wrote confirming all that BS?
[These vases have the same species of dinosaur on them with dermal spines.] Dermal spines were unknown until 1992, when Stephen Czerkas in his article in geology, documented that they have dermal spines like the iguana
😵
Fat faced fuk a few months earlier:
- Let's see. Well, what is this then? Hm, dermal spines. We didn't know about those until 1992. That's interesting. Just like the iguana. I wonder what animal they could have seen here in south america that looks like an iguana. Hm.
{Ten minute silence - cogwheels spinning}
Dinosaur! It's a friggin' dinosaur! Oh, I got them now! I got them! Those damn evilutionists. This will shut them up, for sure.
1 edit
Originally posted by C Hess
You have to admit. There's a certain comedy value here:, when Stephen Czerkas in his article in geology, documented that they have dermal spines like the iguana
[These vases have the same species of dinosaur on them with dermal spines.] [b]Dermal spines were unknown until 1992
😵
Fat faced fuk a few months earlier:
- Le ...[text shortened]... aur! Oh, I got them now! I got them! Those damn evilutionists. This will shut them up, for sure.[/b]Undeniable evidence proving dinosaurs lived with humans
SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR YOUNG EARTH - "DINOSAUR" BONE HAS SOFT TISSUE!
Evolution Embarrassed YET AGAIN! Dinosaur Soft Tissue - NOT "Biofilm!"
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsYou REALLY need to check your meds. We went over this last year. Did you forget that also?
Undeniable evidence proving dinosaurs lived with humans
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6GiNQvugn0
SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR YOUNG EARTH - "DINOSAUR" BONE HAS SOFT TISSUE!
Evolution Embarrassed YET AGAIN! Dinosaur Soft Tissue - NOT "Biofilm!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btnIltCgnf0
If you are not on memory meds you need to start. I have an excellent memory, unfortunately for you.
Originally posted by sonhouseI brought it up again because it proves that the dinosaurs are not millions of years old and it provides more evidence that evolution is a fraud. 😏
You REALLY need to check your meds. We went over this last year. Did you forget that also?
If you are not on memory meds you need to start. I have an excellent memory, unfortunately for you.
2 edits
Originally posted by C HessIt does unless someone can prove how that "soft tissue" survived in the T-Rex dinosaur bones for 65 million years. Also how do you account for all those carvings and drawings of dinosaurs by ancient natives if they had not saw some? 😏
It proves nothing of the sort.
YEC again, you fail.
Originally posted by RJHindsThere has been found soft tissue inside frozen mastodons 50,000 years ago, sorry, that just proves that soft tissue can, under some circumstances, survive a long long time. You can't use that in your stupid Young Earth argument. There IS no scientific argument, if there was, there would be peer reviewed papers.
It does unless someone can prove how that "soft tissue" survived in the T-Rex dinosaur bones for 65 million years. 😏
Instead, those so-called Phd's you tout know full well they have no scientific case but instead take the political stance of trying to convince people in opinion you tube video's you seem to think proves something.
All it proves is some Phd showing his or her religious bias in an attempt to DESTROY science, having ZERO interest in searching for truth.
They just want to FORCE your YEC BULLSHTYE fairy tale to further their REAL goal, the Iranization of the US.
Originally posted by RJHindsYou brought it up 'again' because you didn't remember bringing it up the last time. Don't kid yourself. You have a problem with memory.
I brought it up again because it proves that the dinosaurs are not millions of years old and it provides more evidence that evolution is a fraud. 😏