Someone said in another thread that we 'need' Dasa in these forums. What is the general consensus on this?
Personally, i think these forums are healthier when every religion (or non-religion) is represented. This leads to a wider pool of discussion and opinions which can only enhance the enjoyment of these forums for all of us. - But i am also left wondering, although we need a Hindu (?), do we really 'need' a Dasa, do we need an extremist representative of his religion who spreads hate, intolerance (of pretty much everybody) and frequently advocates genocide and the demonetization of an entire race/religion?
The milk of interest keeps all our cereal choices afloat, but doesn't Dasa's brand of cheap coco pops corrupts the milk and make everything taste a bit nasty?
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeI don't think he adds anything useful to the forum, mostly because he refuses to actually discuss anything and just keeps on repeating the same old mantra.
Someone said in another thread that we 'need' Dasa in these forums. What is the general consensus on this?
I would only advocate forcibly excluding him if he violates forum rules (which he has done from time to time).
The sad thing about human nature is that people seem to be unable to resist responding to extremist views (Trump), so he gets traction and keeps coming back.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeAlthough your antipathy to Coco Pops on the basis that they turn the milk chocolatey did seem just a teensy bit racist to me.
Sir, you are growing on me.
But FMF has convinced me that you have the right to advance your cereal/lactic apartheid agenda.
