Originally posted by RJHinds To eliminate or terminate a "disease" is a good thing, not "genocide" IMO.
If Islam is a "disease" it is not genocide to eliminate it, even if, it involves
eliminating human beings.
How is what you are you exhibiting here any different from how the Nazis rationalized their genocide against Jews? The Nazis described them as vermin, a disease, evil, subhuman and a whole range of epithets etc. If the Nazis believed that Jews were a "disease", does that mean, in your view, their attempt to eliminate them - the Holocaust - was "not genocide" and "a good thing"?
Originally posted by FMF How is what you are you exhibiting here any different from how the Nazis rationalized their genocide against Jews? The Nazis described them as vermin, a disease, evil, subhuman and a whole range of epithets etc. If the Nazis believed that Jews were a "disease", does that mean, in your view, their attempt to eliminate them - the Holocaust - was "not genocide" and "a good thing"?
No. Dasa and I are not calling for any genocide against a race of people.
Originally posted by RJHinds No. Dasa and I are not calling for any genocide against a race of people.
The issue is Dasa's call for genocide against "all Muslim men" not genocide against "a race of people". With your latest comments about Islam being a "disease", do you then agree that the Nazi attempt to eliminate Jews - although you may not yourself agree with what they did - was in fact justifiable [according to your idea of calling humans a "disease", thus justifying their elimination] and therefore "not genocide"?
Originally posted by FMF The issue is Dasa's call for genocide against "all Muslim men" not genocide against "a race of people". With your latest comments about Islam being a "disease", do you then agree that the Nazi attempt to eliminate Jews - although you may not yourself agree with what they did - was in fact justifiable [according to your idea of calling humans a "disease", thus justifying their elimination] and therefore "not genocide"?
No, I do not see the Nazi attempt to eliminate Jews justifiable.
Originally posted by deenny How would you illiminate the "disease" of Islam.
How do you see Christ doing the same on his second coming
I don't truly understand this "disease of the mind" associated with some
in the Islamic religion, but I believe it has Satanic roots and Christ is due
to overcome all these evils upon His second coming, as I understand it.
P.S. It may have something to do with what the Holy Bible refers to as
demon possession.
Originally posted by RJHinds No, I do not see the Nazi attempt to eliminate justifiable.
And yet the Nazi's justification for genocide against Jews is essentially the same as your justification for supporting Dasa's call for genocide against Muslims. You declare that Islam is a "disease" and therefore it is "a good thing" to eliminate its adherents just as the Nazis declared that Jews were a "disease" and therefore it was "a good thing" to eliminate its adherents. You and Dasa are simply taking the Nazi's rationale for genocide and applying it to a different religion.
Originally posted by FMF And yet the Nazi's justification for genocide against Jews is essentially the same as your justification for supporting Dasa's call for genocide against Muslims. You declare that Islam is a "disease" and therefore it is "a good thing" to eliminate its adherents just as the Nazis declared that Jews were a "disease" and therefore it was "a good thing" to eliminate ...[text shortened]... ply taking the Nazi's rationale for genocide and applying it to a different religion.
The difference is one is true and the other one was false.
Originally posted by RJHinds I am sorry to say that will not happen regardless of Dasa and my opinion.
So no need for you to worry about your Muslim brothers until Christ returns.
I am sorry to say that will not happen regardless of Dasa and my opinion.
You're "sorry to say" the genocide won't happen for the time being? Oh well. If I am charitable I can accept that you're probably just trying to court controversy for a bit of forum mischief, and I am willing to believe you may be a far more decent person in real life than you project yourself as here. However, do you ever wonder whether your statements about genocide are in poor taste or whether they bring your own mind map - and even perhaps your own religion too - into disrepute?
Originally posted by FMF [b]I am sorry to say that will not happen regardless of Dasa and my opinion.
You're "sorry to say" the genocide won't happen for the time being? Oh well. If I am charitable I can accept that you're probably just trying to court controversy for a bit of forum mischief, and I am willing to believe you may be a far more decent person in real life than you pr ...[text shortened]... her they bring your own mind map - and even perhaps your own religion too - into disrepute?[/b]
You apparently have forgotten that you were the one that started speaking
of genocide, not me. 😏
Originally posted by RJHinds You apparently have forgotten that you were the one that started speaking
of genocide, not me. 😏
It was Dasa who started it, as you know. And if your support for genocide - which has become even more explicit on this thread than it was before - is some kind of running joke you are attempting, I do wonder what you think the value of your humour is to this community and what damage it causes to people's perception of you and your 'brand' of Christianity?
Originally posted by FMF It was Dasa who started it, as you know. And if your support for genocide - which has become even more explicit on this thread than it was before - is some kind of running joke you are attempting, I do wonder what you think the value of your humour is to this community and what damage it causes to people's perception of you and your 'brand' of Christianity?
Why should I care about other people's perception of me, when I don't even
know them? And what is my 'brand' of Christianity?
dasa/poker38 meaty questions!!!
11 Feb '12 00:55
Back to Top