Originally posted by josephwOn this forum you offer religionist dogma and virtually nothing else. I find it good to be personally free from it but I do enjoy engaging those who propagate it.
That's right! You don't want to be religiously dogmatic. In that you're more like josephw. Contrary to what you may think you know about him.
Do you think FMF is Godless? If not, how does he know God? Please don't tell josephw FMF knows God with his gut. That would be rather religious.
Originally posted by FMFGlad to hear you're enjoying yourself. I enjoy it too. At least we have that much in common.
On this forum you offer religionist dogma and virtually nothing else. I find it good to be personally free from it but I do enjoy engaging those who propagate it.
The dogma I "offer" isn't religious. That's just your perspective. An incorrect perspective. If you knew me you would think I was a heathen. I do not practice religion according to what you think religion is.
The doctrine I profess is straight from the mouth of God. You might want to think about what you say about what God has spoken before you criticize it. After all, as a deist, you can't be sure God hasn't spoken.
Originally posted by josephwYour beliefs are religious beliefs. Most of what you say here is religious dogma or rooted in it. What you "practise" is neither here nor there. I am talking about what you post in this forum.
The dogma I "offer" isn't religious. That's just your perspective. An incorrect perspective. If you knew me you would think I was a heathen. I do not practice religion according to what you think religion is.
Originally posted by FMFNo, the doctrine I profess is the truth of God's Word and has nothing to do with religion as you know it.
You are religious. Your beliefs are religious beliefs. Your religion is Christianity. When you say "The doctrine I profess is strait from the mouth of God", the doctrine you profess is the religion you profess.
Originally posted by josephwAs I said, that you believe the doctrine [you] profess is the truth of God's Word, is one of your religious beliefs. Indeed it is one of your most fundamental religious beliefs. The bit about it having "nothing to do with religion", I presume, is just you trying to display your sincerity and strength of conviction that you are somehow different from billions of other religionists around the world.
No, the doctrine I profess is the truth of God's Word and has nothing to do with religion as you know it.
Originally posted by FMFPlease. Believers. Not "religionists".
As I said, that you believe the doctrine [you] profess is the truth of God's Word, is one of your religious beliefs. Indeed it is one of your most fundamental religious beliefs. The bit about it having "nothing to do with religion", I presume, is just you trying to display your sincerity and strength of conviction that you are somehow different from billions of other religionists around the world.
You must work for the mass media. If not, you missed your calling.
You know next to nothing of him. In fact, even I find your labels wildly inappropriate, given what I know about him.
But, as you say, you use words for the precise meaning you want them to convey. But in this case (as is often the case), you are simply wrong, thus showing your mislabeling of him is just what it is, misrepresentation.
And yes, btw, there IS another word for that.
Originally posted by FMFIt is different from your religious beliefs of Islam, Buddism, Shintoism, Hinduism, Taoism, Confucianism, and Witchcraft.
As I said, that you believe the doctrine [you] profess is the truth of God's Word, is one of your religious beliefs. Indeed it is one of your most fundamental religious beliefs. The bit about it having "nothing to do with religion", I presume, is just you trying to display your sincerity and strength of conviction that you are somehow different from billions of other religionists around the world.