31 May '09 07:14>
Originally posted by scherzo
That's not counterpoint. That's discrimination.[/quote]
No, it's an observation based on the information I get on a daily basis through a plethora of sources. If you want to put the blame on someone for my beliefs, put it on Western media and many internet news sources. I don't purport to get my information from anywhere but the aforementioned. But I do get a lot of information. More than your average bear, that's for sure.
I don't believe that to be true. But neither of us would be able to convince the other, that we know one way or the other firsthand. Even if you are a self-proclaimed Muslim who believes jihad might not even come, I personally believe you are in a microscopic minority.
About the only argument I have against that is, today mankind as a whole is a ton more civilized and technologically advanced, so the Muslims have a little bit less of an excuse. But for the most part, your point is accepted. It's a good point.
Well, true, during the time Mohammed was in Mecca, military conquest and forcible expansion was apparently not the goal. But that all changed after he moved to Medina and even if the pagans in the area "picked the fight" the fact is, expansion through force and political / military ideology became core values of Islam.
That's not counterpoint. That's discrimination.[/quote]
No, it's an observation based on the information I get on a daily basis through a plethora of sources. If you want to put the blame on someone for my beliefs, put it on Western media and many internet news sources. I don't purport to get my information from anywhere but the aforementioned. But I do get a lot of information. More than your average bear, that's for sure.
Wrong. The (vast) majority of Muslims believe that the time for jihad is either in the future or will never come.
I don't believe that to be true. But neither of us would be able to convince the other, that we know one way or the other firsthand. Even if you are a self-proclaimed Muslim who believes jihad might not even come, I personally believe you are in a microscopic minority.
No, it isn't. Keep in mind, by the way, that Islam is about 650 years younger than Christianity. 650 years ago, Christians were still burning each other for saying that the Earth revolved around the Sun. At the same time, Islam was in a golden age. Is the golden age still going on? No. But we're a lot better now than you were when your religion was the age that ours is right now.
About the only argument I have against that is, today mankind as a whole is a ton more civilized and technologically advanced, so the Muslims have a little bit less of an excuse. But for the most part, your point is accepted. It's a good point.
First of all, you can't compare the Crusades to what Muslims did. Although a lot of attacks precipitated by "Holy War" for so-called Muslims have happened recently, nothing compares to the absolute evil of the Crusades. As for witch hunts --- see above for my comment about the golden age. And Mohammed was not a conqueror until he received the vision. Before then he was a merchant. He was forced to become a conqueror when the pagan rulers of the Arabian Peninsula tried to force him into exile with his followers.
Well, true, during the time Mohammed was in Mecca, military conquest and forcible expansion was apparently not the goal. But that all changed after he moved to Medina and even if the pagans in the area "picked the fight" the fact is, expansion through force and political / military ideology became core values of Islam.