Originally posted by masscat
The argument is over who he was and what he did.
Why do you sat that?
The passages in Josephus bear undeniable signs of interpolation. That is to say the references to Jesus do not appear to have been written by Jospehus, but added at a later time by author(s) unknown.
I know of almost no Bible scholars (both secular and Christian) who whould deny that Jesus actually existed.
Fine, provided you realize that doesn't mean there
aren't any. Please also try to keep in mind, Historians are probably a better source of information and analysis than ill-defined "biblical scholars", as they are more likely to be unclouded by blatant presupposition of the "truth" in the biblical narrative. Linguists would also make a better choice.
Anyway, the earth is flat, the Holocaust never happened...
Yes, yes, I've heard it all before, Lucy Jr. There is verifiable evidence for Abraham Lincoln's existence, documents he signed, photo- and lithographs of the man. Mountains of governmental documents referencing him as the 16th POTUS. There are minted Roman coins bearing the likeness of Julius Caesar. There is empirical evidence for a moon landing. What there isn't, masscat, is any reliable extra-biblical evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ. In fact, the astonishing lack of any such real evidence makes the case all the more curious...because there is no denying the existence of Christianity itself.