Originally posted by Great King RatThat's not even the same thing. It's not even the same ballpark, in fact it's not even the same sport.
Same way you know The Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't exist (sorry Pastafarians).
Does the FSM have a 3500 year old accounting of his activities? No, he was invented in 2005. Ten years doesn't a deity make. His only purpose is to make fun of the one true God.
And that's how we know he doesn't exist. You only wish God didn't exist.
Originally posted by SuzianneHe wasn't "invented" 10 years ago, you blasphemer! He simply made himself known to us 10 years ago. Big difference. Your rejection of Him is your choice and yours alone. The consequences are therefore yours as well. I can't make that choice for you, I can merely point you in His Noodleistic direction. May you find the holiest of Spaghettios one day, and bask in His Saucy Glory.
That's not even the same thing. It's not even the same ballpark, in fact it's not even the same sport.
Does the FSM have a 3500 year old accounting of his activities? No, he was invented in 2005. Ten years doesn't a deity make. His only purpose is to make fun of the one true God.
And that's how we know he doesn't exist. You only wish God didn't exist.
Pasta.
1 edit
Originally posted by Great King RatYour claiming this pasta monster was just late coming out of the closet is not very convincing, considering the information in the Wikipedia article. What do you have that proves the Wikipedia article is false?
He wasn't "invented" 10 years ago, you blasphemer! He simply made himself known to us 10 years ago. Big difference. Your rejection of Him is your choice and yours alone. The consequences are therefore yours as well. I can't make that choice for you, I can merely point you in His Noodleistic direction. May you find the holiest of Spaghettios one day, and bask in His Saucy Glory.
Pasta.
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat do you have that proves the Wikipedia article is not false?
Your claiming this pasta monster was just late coming out of the closet is not very convincing, considering the information in the Wikipedia article. What do you have that proves the Wikipedia article is false?
Originally posted by Great King RatThe main reference given in the Wikipedia articled proves this pasta monster was made up, even giving the name of the creator of the pasta monster. That is good enough for a person who possesses common sense, even if he is not....
What do you have that proves the Wikipedia article is not false?
The Near Genius. 😏
Originally posted by RJHindsKind of like Christianity.
The main reference given in the Wikipedia articled proves this pasta monster was made up, even giving the name of the creator of the pasta monster. That is good enough for a person who possesses common sense, even if he is not....
The Near Genius. 😏
2 edits
Originally posted by RJHindsWhy do you assume the secular human does not believe in God?
How can we explain to the secular human that God exist?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CUiDuHvIR0
a. Worldly rather than spiritual: the secular affairs of the parish.
b. Not relating to religion or to a religious body; nonreligious: secular music.
c. Not bound by the full monastic rule of a religious order. Used of clergy.
2. Relating to or advocating secularism.
3.
a. Occurring or observed once in an age or century, as games in ancient Rome.
b. Lasting or persisting for a long time: a secular bear market.
c. Astronomy Of or relating to characteristics of astronomical phenomena that change slowly over time.
n.
1. A member of the secular clergy.
2. A layperson.