1. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    16 Apr '15 21:57
    Originally posted by finnegan
    Why do you assume the secular human does not believe in God?

    a. Worldly rather than spiritual: the secular affairs of the parish.
    b. Not relating to religion or to a religious body; nonreligious: secular music.
    c. Not bound by the full monastic rule of a religious order. Used of clergy.
    2. Relating to or advocating secularism.
    3.
    a. Occurring ...[text shortened]... a that change slowly over time.
    n.
    1. A member of the secular clergy.
    2. A layperson.
    I did not assume that. The question is the name of the linked video. 😏
  2. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    36617
    16 Apr '15 23:41
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Kind of like Christianity.
    Hahaha... that's a good one.

    Not true, but still, I got a giggle out of it.
  3. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    36617
    16 Apr '15 23:46
    Originally posted by finnegan
    Why do you assume the secular human does not believe in God?
    I would hazard a guess and just say probably usage, as well as assumption.

    Most people use 'secular' as an antonym of 'religious'. But yes, I've known many people who, while they do believe in God, could not be properly called 'religious'.
  4. Standard memberfinnegan
    GENS UNA SUMUS
    Joined
    25 Jun '06
    Moves
    64930
    17 Apr '15 08:52
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    I would hazard a guess and just say probably usage, as well as assumption.

    Most people use 'secular' as an antonym of 'religious'. But yes, I've known many people who, while they do believe in God, could not be properly called 'religious'.
    So would secular clergy not be properly called religious then? Must a lay person not be properly called religious (and hence only the clergy are)? What a knot this is!
  5. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    17 Apr '15 17:34
    Originally posted by finnegan
    So would secular clergy not be properly called religious then? Must a lay person not be properly called religious (and hence only the clergy are)? What a knot this is!
    You are making up things as you go.
  6. Standard memberfinnegan
    GENS UNA SUMUS
    Joined
    25 Jun '06
    Moves
    64930
    18 Apr '15 10:17
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    You are making up things as you go.
    Not so.

    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/secular
  7. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    18 Apr '15 17:221 edit
    Originally posted by finnegan
    Not so.

    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/secular
    clergy

    n.
    The body of people ordained or recognized by a religious community as ritual or spiritual leaders.

    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/clergy

    secular

    adj.
    1.
    a. Worldly rather than spiritual: the secular affairs of the parish.

    b. Not relating to religion or to a religious body; nonreligious: secular music.

    c. Not bound by the full monastic rule of a religious order. Used of clergy.

    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/secular

    Okay, someone else made it up. Secular clergy is an oxymoron. However, it could refer to those involved in the secular affairs of the parish or church like a secretary.

    secular humanism

    n.
    1. An outlook or philosophy that advocates human rather than religious values.

    2. Secularism.

    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Secular+humanists

    humanism

    A view originating in the Renaissance that reason must be autonomous from authorities such as the Church.
  8. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    36617
    19 Apr '15 23:52
    Originally posted by finnegan
    So would secular clergy not be properly called religious then? Must a lay person not be properly called religious (and hence only the clergy are)? What a knot this is!
    I think English is flexible enough to write and speak as you wish to describe things or people accurately. In some cases, you may have to explain yourself, but I suppose that's the risk you take when using words together that aren't normally (or even usually) used together.
  9. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    23 Apr '15 11:45
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    I think English is flexible enough to write and speak as you wish to describe things or people accurately. In some cases, you may have to explain yourself, but I suppose that's the risk you take when using words together that aren't normally (or even usually) used together.
    Nobody has actually answered his question I see.
  10. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    23 Apr '15 12:40
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Nobody has actually answered his question I see.
    The answer is obviously yes? So why must anyone answer it, since even an idiot knows it a rhetorical question. So you must be a numbnuts. 😏
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree