Originally posted by kirksey957Your funny remarks usually are very sad. It depends on what perspective one chooses. One can choose the "trying to be clever" perspective ...... or the "trying to please my audience and thus trying to receive applause and recognition" perspective ... of course there are many others ......
Actually, what I wrote I considered to be rather sad. There were no "funny" intentions at all in it.
Originally posted by ivanhoeIt is hardly a well thought out critique. Surely you could do better.
If someone wants to read a serious critique on Dawkin's ideas about religion, he or she should read it. That's the reason why I post these critical articles.
People who are not seriously interested or people who want to swallow Dawkins's views withour investigating them have the possibility of skipping the threads wherein I present this criticism.
Now, do you have anything serious to communicate about the content of the article ?
I personally would agree with the statement that many people have an impoverished view of the universe partly due to their religions. The critique does not address this but rather tries to claim that because there are a few enquiring mind amongst religious people then religion (specifically Christianity) is not to blame. It totally ignores the fact that other religions exist and overlooks the possibility that many religious people are encouraged not to question many religious teachings.
Originally posted by ivanhoeThis ignorance of the Father brought about terror and fear. And terror became dense like a fog, that no one was able to see. Because of this, error became strong.
'
"The strategy of the materialist atheists is usually to claim that science is all, and that beauty and the rest are merely human constructs arising from the hard-wiring in our brains. I cannot accept so grotesquely impoverished a view of reality."
John Polkinghorne
Valentinus ...."Gospel of Truth"
of course that was before Constantine turned Christianity into the religion of the Roman Empire, repleat with the violence and privilege.