1. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    06 Dec '14 06:12
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Now apply that thinking .....
    But it isn't thinking. It is merely a tautology. A person with common sense believes a 'building built for people to live in' (mansion) was 'designed by intelligent beings' because that is how it is defined. To say a house was designed by intelligent beings is like saying a house is a house.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_(rhetoric)
  2. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    03 Jan '13
    Moves
    13080
    06 Dec '14 06:38
    Evolution Demolition is a good video lecture imo.

    YouTube
  3. Joined
    31 Aug '06
    Moves
    40565
    06 Dec '14 07:42
    Originally posted by sonship
    [b] Evolution Demolition is a good video lecture imo.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wf32BXMSN7A[/b]
    It's only a good "lecture" if you ignore what science and evolution is actually all about. I deconstructed this video (or the first parts of it) just weeks ago, when RJHinds linked to it. In essence, the reply is:

    1) evolution is not a completely random process, and
    2) abiogenesis is not evolution

    Knowing that, one can look at the video and quickly realise it's all bunk.
  4. Joined
    31 Aug '06
    Moves
    40565
    06 Dec '14 08:09
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    The men built "mansions" did not survive the Worlwide flood. Only a special ark boat designed by God could do that.
    Okay, so here's what we got so far. You assert that hurricane-proof mansions are built by intelligent agents. It's been pointed out to you that a cave can be used as a mansion, is hurricane-proof, and doesn't require an intelligent builder. You ignore that, and state that humans are now mansions. Humans are not hurricane-proof, thus of a lesser design than human-built, hurricane-proof mansions. You now divert attention to a human-built boat that could survive a worldwide flood. You know what else could survive a worldwide flood? That's right, a non-designed, hurricane-proof cave. If humans are mansions, I'd say they're more like the cave than the purposebuilt 20 million dollar mansion. Why? Because they lack exclusive roof tiles on top, that's why.

    Just admit it, your analogy sucks. Houses need not be built with a purpose by an intelligent agent.
  5. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    06 Dec '14 18:141 edit
    Originally posted by C Hess
    It's only a good "lecture" if you ignore what science and evolution is actually all about. I deconstructed this video (or the first parts of it) just weeks ago, when RJHinds linked to it. In essence, the reply is:

    1) evolution is not a completely random process, and
    2) abiogenesis is not evolution

    Knowing that, one can look at the video and quickly realise it's all bunk.
    Evolution has no mind so it has to be a random process. Evolutionists need abiogenesis to be true, else there must be an intelligent source of life outside of nature which means mindless evolution is superseded by intelligent design creation.
  6. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    06 Dec '14 18:322 edits
    Originally posted by C Hess
    Okay, so here's what we got so far. You assert that hurricane-proof mansions are built by intelligent agents. It's been pointed out to you that a cave can be used as a mansion, is hurricane-proof, and doesn't require an intelligent builder. You ignore that, and state that humans are now mansions. Humans are not hurricane-proof, thus of a lesser design than hu ...[text shortened]... t admit it, your analogy sucks. Houses need not be built with a purpose by an intelligent agent.
    You have attempted to divert attention away from the fact that mansions or houses are designed and built with specific purposes in mind. That is true of the heavens and the earth and all living things.

    Evolution can not build a mansion for specific purposes because it has no mind. It is obvious to even most idiots that boats and mansions are designed and built for specific purposes by the designer and builder. For you to attempt to equate that to natural caves is the thinking of a madman or a numbnuts.
  7. Joined
    31 Aug '06
    Moves
    40565
    07 Dec '14 09:05
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    You have attempted to divert attention away from the fact that mansions or houses are designed and built with specific purposes in mind. That is true of the heavens and the earth and all living things.

    Evolution can not build a mansion for specific purposes because it has no mind. It is obvious to even most idiots that boats and mansions are designed an ...[text shortened]... . For you to attempt to equate that to natural caves is the thinking of a madman or a numbnuts.
    Can we agree that a non-designed cave is useful as a hurricane-proof home?
  8. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    07 Dec '14 22:28
    Originally posted by C Hess
    Can we agree that a non-designed cave is useful as a hurricane-proof home?
    It is possible that a cave that is high enough and in the right place could offer protection from a hurricane, but that is different from someone building these mansions near the beach in Florida today that are designed to withstand hurricanes.
  9. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    08 Dec '14 06:11
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    That is true of the heavens and the earth and all living things.
    But apparently not caves? How did caves come in to being?
  10. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    09 Dec '14 08:20
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    But apparently not caves? How did caves come in to being?
    By natural selection?
  11. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    09 Dec '14 08:28
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Evolution has no mind so it has to be a random process.
    What do you mean by 'random process'? Are chemical reactions random processes? For example, if you mix hydrogen and oxygen, they react to form water. That is clearly a process. I wouldn't call that random. Would you?
  12. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    09 Dec '14 08:43
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    What do you mean by 'random process'? Are chemical reactions random processes? For example, if you mix hydrogen and oxygen, they react to form water. That is clearly a process. I wouldn't call that random. Would you?
    Obviously they are designed by God to react as they do.
  13. Joined
    31 Aug '06
    Moves
    40565
    09 Dec '14 11:47
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Obviously they are designed by God to react as they do.
    So why can't biochemicals be designed by god to build life forms?
  14. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    09 Dec '14 11:48
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Obviously they are designed by God to react as they do.
    So it could have been just the same for evolution, the entire shebang set up by your god in advance so evolution would be the driving force just like your god set things up for hydrogen and oxygen to combine to make water.
  15. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    09 Dec '14 13:371 edit
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Obviously they are designed by God to react as they do.
    So are you agreeing that a typical chemical reaction is not a random process?

    So if I said 'chemical reactions have no mind, so they have to be a random process' I would clearly be wrong? Or do chemical reactions have a mind?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree