@pettytalk said"God saw all that he had made, and it was very good."
To show us his perfection? A perfect being can create either. It's the imperfect being who cannot create perfection.
And since nature is ever changing, some take it that nature cannot be their god/gods, it stands to reason. After all, no matter the story or whence it came, we all know that man is not perfect.....if he was he would live forever, in perfect harmony.
Was there a sub clause about leaving in one or two imperfections?
@pettytalk saidBoy, will the kinks and fold marks in your straight-faced contortionist reasoning EVER get smoothed out again after this? Or is one of the lumps I see caused by your tongue in your cheek?
To show us his perfection? A perfect being can create either. It's the imperfect being who cannot create perfection.
And since nature is ever changing, some take it that nature cannot be their god/gods, it stands to reason. After all, no matter the story or whence it came, we all know that man is not perfect.....if he was he would live forever, in perfect harmony.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI think this is a clear flaw in the anthropomorphizers' insistence that the nature of the universe has some sort of humanoid moral purpose.
"God saw all that he had made, and it was very good."
Was there a sub clause about leaving in one or two imperfections?
@fmf saidWe have evolved to adapt to a hostile world that has frequently sought our destruction.
I think this is a clear flaw in the anthropomorphizers' insistence that the nature of the universe has some sort of humanoid moral purpose.