Evidence please

Originally posted by @sonship
Unnecessary agitating [on my part]. Erased.

[ I'm sorry. ]
This forum needs some fresh relationships.

No, FMF, it was not because of anything you wrote that I decided to erase.

Unnecessary "agitating" or not, I take it you endorse what is going on

Originally posted by @romans1009
Why won’t you Google a specific article? If you’re genuinely interested in information, I don’t understand your objection.
But if your real interest is in manipulating people into doing work for your trolling pleasure, I can see why you’d want me to summarize or copy-and-paste the article.

The dude doesn't seem to understand the difference between evidence and proof. I have given him loads of evidence to which he responds that's not proof. I think we are wasting our time with him because he cannot even seem to tell us why the evidence that we present cannot be regarded as evidence. Even if he doesn't regard it as evidence it doesn't mean that we or anyone else can't. He is just trolling.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
The dude doesn't seem to understand the difference between evidence and proof. I have given him loads of evidence to which he responds that's not proof. I think we are wasting our time with him because he cannot even seem to tell us why the evidence that we present cannot be regarded as evidence. Even if he doesn't regard it as evidence it doesn't mean that we or anyone else can't. He is just trolling.

Isn't the use of the word "dude" one of the affectations you were trying to use to differentiate yourself from Romans 1009?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
The dude doesn't seem to understand the difference between evidence and proof. I have given him loads of evidence to which he responds that's not proof. I think we are wasting our time with him because he cannot even seem to tell us why the evidence that we present cannot be regarded as evidence. Even if he doesn't regard it as evidence it doesn't mean that we or anyone else can't. He is just trolling.

He also thinks I’m you or you’re me. Just a diversionary tactic in his and others’ trolling toolbox.
But if you really are me, or I’m really you, does this mean I’m talking to myself? Has anyone ever seen you and I at the same time? Do I see you when I look in the mirror? Do you see me? If my ear itches, will you scratching your ear take care of it? If you get drunk, does my speech become slurred?
So many questions. How have you been? Or do I already know that?

Originally posted by @fmf
Isn't the use of the word "dude" one of the affectations you were trying to use to differentiate yourself from Romans 1009?

Are you addressing this to me, dude?
Oops!
As Jerry said in the original “The Stepfather” movie, “Wait a minute. Who am I here?”

Originally posted by @romans1009
Are you addressing this to me, dude?

No, I was drawing attention to what appears to be a minor, but revealing, slip up.

Originally posted by @fmf
Isn't the use of the word "dude" one of the affectations you were trying to use to differentiate yourself from Romans 1009?

The word ‘dude’ was referring to divegeester. Have you had your coffee this morning?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
The word ‘dude’ was referring to divegeester. Have you had your coffee this morning?

Yes, I notice how you - posting as dj2becker - used the word "dude".

Originally posted by @fmf
No, I was drawing attention to what appears to be a minor, but revealing, slip up.

Ah, I see. Carry on.
Wait. Let me guess. Becker says “Ah” and “Carry on” too.
Rats!
(Does Becker say “rats” in lieu of profanity too? Does he say “in lieu of” a lot?
I wanna be just like him!
Wait a minute. Maybe I am him. Or he’s me. Or we’re we. Together. We might even be best friends. If we are best friends, does that mean I’m really lonely?

Originally posted by @romans1009
Ah, I see. Carry on.
Wait. Let me guess. Becker says “Ah” and “Carry on” too.
Rats!
(Does Becker say “rats” in lieu of profanity too? Does he say “in lieu of” a lot?
I wanna be just like him!
Wait a minute. Maybe I am him. Or he’s me. Or we’re we. Together. We might even be best friends. If we are best friends, does that mean I’m really lonely?

There's plenty enough mannerisms stuff going on without you having to offer any more suggestions.

Originally posted by @fmf
There's plenty enough mannerisms stuff going on without you having to offer any more suggestions.

If Becker and I get in an argument, does that mean I always win? Or that he always wins? Or that we both win?

Originally posted by @romans1009
If Becker and I get in an argument, does that mean I always win? Or that he always wins? Or that we both win?

If the two screen names stage a discussion, it will be quite a spectacle. Those of us who have been keeping tabs on what has been going on will make of it what we will.

Originally posted by @fmf
If the two screen names stage a discussion, it will be quite a spectacle. Those of us who have been keeping tabs on what has been going on will make of it what we will.

But what will happen if we both post simultaneously? Or within a millisecond of each other. Does that prove time travel is possible? Or will we have bent space/time?
Mind. Blown.

Originally posted by @romans1009
But what will happen if we both post simultaneously? Or within a millisecond of each other. Does that prove time travel is possible? Or will we have bent space/time?
Mind. Blown.

Well in my case, I have three computers in my house.

Originally posted by @fmf
Well in my case, I have three computers in my house.

But can you get from one computer to another in a millisecond? Or would that be solved by putting the computers next to each other, typing a post on one and then typing a post on the other one and then hitting the “post” buttons on each computer simultaneously?