20 Aug '10 14:12>
Originally posted by FabianFnasSome think it's a legend but "we" millions don't.
According to the legend... However, we don't believe in legends uncondtionally do we?
Originally posted by ZahlanziLol... Strange explination. But I guess or ancestors ran over to WalMart and bought themselves some binoculars to catch their dinners with. I forgot about that...
because you don't evolve to be the best you evolve to survive.
and even so, we are the most intelligent, what more do you want? why do you need now prefect eyesight when you can buy binoculars and you aren't even watching for predators? what use is that to you?
Originally posted by galveston75You JW culter minority believes it. Do you believe in other fables too? Like how the elephant got his long trunk? And why elephants cry? And such?
Some think it's a legend but "we" millions don't.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyAnd this has to do with Darwinian evolution ... how?
Do you hold that planet earth, the Milky Way, other galaxies and the unfathomable
universe itself also evolved as the handiwork of something unintelligent and blind?
................................................................................
Originally posted by FabianFnasEverything, Swede. Thought maybe the 'a fortiori' argument might add critical leverage/depth to your intellectual posture and bolster your public forum claims. You still remember the inferential principle of stronger/greater to weaker/lesser: if the origin and continued presence of an entire universe is definitively attributed to something unintelligent and blind then, ipso facto, logically follows that the selfsame unintelligent/blind something could easily be relied upon to populate one tiny planet with ease.
And this has to do with Darwinian evolution ... how?
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyAre you trying to avoid the Darwinism matter because you know you are wrong?
Everything, Swede. Thought maybe the 'a fortiori' argument might add critical leverage/depth to your intellectual posture and bolster your public forum claims. You still remember the inferential principle of stronger/greater to weaker/lesser: if the origin and continued presence of an entire universe is definitively attributed to something unintelligent ...[text shortened]... with ease.
............................................................................
Originally posted by FabianFnasThread topic happens to be 'evolution'. Darwin happens to be one of many human authors who have speculated on the concept and become steadfast proponents. Open ended broad scale conversation holds far more appeal than prematurely diving headlong into some myopic surf on Darwin Street Beach at low tide. And doubt Freaky would take kindly to hijacking.
Are you trying to avoid the Darwinism matter because you know you are wrong?
Darwin didn't say much about astronomical matters, so this cannot be "Everything", that's just a non-answer, meaning nothing, meaning pure avoidance.
So again, what has it to do with Darwinism? And don't give me a non-answer now, just answer it, or admit that you don't know anything about evolution.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby“…if the origin and continued presence of an entire universe is definitively attributed to something unintelligent and blind then, ipso facto, LOGICALLY FOLLOWS that the selfsame unintelligent/blind something could easily be relied upon to populate one tiny planet with ease….” (my emphasis)
Everything, Swede. Thought maybe the 'a fortiori' argument might add critical leverage/depth to your intellectual posture and bolster your public forum claims. You still remember the inferential principle of stronger/greater to weaker/lesser: if the origin and continued presence of an entire universe is definitively attributed to something unintelligent ...[text shortened]... with ease.
............................................................................
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby“…Thread topic happens to be 'evolution'….”
Thread topic happens to be 'evolution'. Darwin happens to be one of many human authors who have speculated on the concept and become steadfast proponents. Open ended broad scale conversation holds far more appeal than prematurely diving headlong into some myopic surf on Darwin Street Beach at low tide. And doubt Freaky would take kindly to hijacking.
....................................................................
Originally posted by FabianFnasNot just the JW's buddy.
You JW culter minority believes it. Do you believe in other fables too? Like how the elephant got his long trunk? And why elephants cry? And such?
We, who observe the nature, and dismiss the legends that not fit into these observations, know that Adam and Eve story is beautiful, but still a legend.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyRight. So let's stick to evolution then. Not astronomy. Let's not get off-topic.
Thread topic happens to be 'evolution'.
Originally posted by Andrew HamiltonMany anti-evolutionists don't understand evolution. When they do, maybe they change their opinion.
“…Thread topic happens to be 'evolution'….”
Exactly!
So what does, as you said “the origin and continued presence of an entire universe” got to do with it? -Nothing.
But you think it is relevant to evolution which clearly shows you don't understand what evolution is.
Evolution is not a theory about “the origin and continued presence of an entire universe”.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyExpected, really.
Thread topic happens to be 'evolution'. Darwin happens to be one of many human authors who have speculated on the concept and become steadfast proponents. Open ended broad scale conversation holds far more appeal than prematurely diving headlong into some myopic surf on Darwin Street Beach at low tide. And doubt Freaky would take kindly to hijacking.
....................................................................
Originally posted by galveston75Why are we not the strongest, the fastest, the best eyes, lungs, hearing, strenght, etc?
Just some intersting differances that are posted here.
http://www.middletownbiblechurch.org/sciences/scienc8.htm
Something I've thought of about humans and if we did evolve, it would seem to me that if we are the result of all the trial and error of evolution constantly improving a species and the end result as we see it now is the human, why woul t that evolution could develope up to this point on all levels, but I just don't see that....