Go back
Evolution

Evolution

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
I'm glad you find me amusing. Mockery is the last refuge of a feeble mind.
Well Hand (et al),

The problem comes down to prooving that it was God. Show me empirical evidence that God even exists.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
Well Hand (et al),

The problem comes down to prooving that it was God. Show me empirical evidence that God even exists.
Creationism is such an absurd idea. In fact unless you live in Arkansas it's pretty much laughed at.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha aha hah aha hah ahah ha

Excuse me, whilst I choke a little...... phew, that's better! Nope, wait, I can't help it, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha hah ah ahah ahaaha ha ah haha
I have similar responses to those comments, scott.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
God is all powerful and, as such, could easily have created fossils and oil fields. He could have simply made the Earth any age he wanted us to perceive it to be. Earth could be 2 days old and you'd never know the difference. We simply will never know one way or the other.
So if God clearly wants us to believe the earth is billions of years old, why do you wish to differ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Hand, if you aren't just stirring the pot consider our friendship severed.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
Okay, magical light aside, the order of the colonisation of land is wrong. The earliest things to not live in water were insects. Insects can be found on the land 30 million years before any have been found which could fly. The bible states that things were flying about before the colonisation of land.
Well, to be perfectly honest, I believe, as I have stated earlier, that the 6 days of creation are not literal days. As Dr. Schroeder stated the earlier the day, the longer the era of creation. The universe is 15 billion years old as started on day one and time halves each day for 6 days as the universe expands. What you are referring to is day 4 of creation which is millions of years long. The verse reads,

"And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creatures that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven."

A note of interest is that God said to let the waters "bring forth" abundantly moving creatures as well as fowl that fly's above the earth. Does this imply an evolutionary process? Also, the "moving creatures" come before the fowls of the air. Could we assume that the "moving creatures" do not include insects? Since the moving creatures are shown to have come first and assuming that day 4 is millions of years old, then insects could have predated the fowl of the air by 30 million years.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by telerion
When this happens you more or less develope your own theology based on choosing a rejecting certain aspects of scripture. This theology would then inherently be flawed due to the fact that an imperfect being such as yourself created it.

Again this is exactly what every xian does. Of course, they don't think they are the ones doing it (all the other xians do though), but it's still the same.
I see what you are saying. Scripture is often interpreted in a myraid of different ways. This only shows that imperfect man is attempting to grasp a perfect message. Am I going to grasp all truths within its constructs? No, I am not. However, the message of scripture can nonetheless enlighten me as to the general message for which it was intended. I will even go as far as saying that grasping truths depends upon my seeking those truths and God revealing those truths to me. God operates via free will and he wants me to want him. I am sure that you have heard the wise saying seek and ye shall find. For example, I could tell you the mysteries of the universe, but if you are not seeking the answer, much of what I tell you will probably not make sense to you. This is because you have not been studying the science behind it in order to familiarize yourself with it in terms of theory/terminology and such or you will have no interest in grasping what I am telling you and you will therefore not desire to comprehend it. So you see, the perfect message may not be totally grasped by an imperfect person such myself, however, to diminish or change the perfect message would inhibit those of us who wish to seek the truth from an oppurtunity of being able to comprehend it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cmsMaster
Creationism is such an absurd idea. In fact unless you live in Arkansas it's pretty much laughed at.
It's an absurd idea to determine the validity of a proposition by the amount of acceptance it receives.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Halitose
It's an absurd idea to determine the validity of a proposition by the amount of acceptance it receives.
My idea can beat up your idea.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
My idea can beat up your idea.
I'm gonna cry. :'(

😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Halitose
It's an absurd idea to determine the validity of a proposition by the amount of acceptance it receives.
What about determining the validity of propositions based on the amount of scientific evidence they have supporting them?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
Also, species evolving into other species has never been observed.
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB910.html

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
What about determining the validity of propositions based on the amount of scientific evidence they have supporting them?
That would apply to inherently naturalistic propositions, yes.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Hand, if you aren't just stirring the pot consider our friendship severed.
'Friend of Xanthos' seems like a dubious honor indeed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
Well, to be perfectly honest, I believe, as I have stated earlier, that the 6 days of creation are not literal days. As Dr. Schroeder stated the earlier the day, the longer the era of creation. The universe is 15 billion years old as started on day one and time halves each day for 6 days as the universe expands. What you are referring to is day 4 of creati ...[text shortened]... of years old, then insects could have predated the fowl of the air by 30 million years.
First you's have to mathematically prove this, secondly you still haven't explained the colonisation of land, which hasn't happened yet.