Originally posted by epiphinehas
I don't mean to be juvenile, but I asked you first. If you prove to me, by whatever means, that there is a distinct possibility that the Flying Spaghetti Monster exists, then I will prove to you that there is a distinct possibility that Jesus Christ is Who He said He was.
You are being juvenile as the implication of your post was that my assertion required proof. As you made your assertion about Jesus before I made mine about Santa, and as it is you making the assertion that such assertions require proof, it stands to reason that you should provide the first proof.
But before we begin, please define what you mean by 'distinct possibility'.
[edit]
Let me proceed with my proof anyway:
Since it is impossible to prove the non existence of any entity without first defining the entity in enough detail as to be able to reasonably rule out its nonexistence and since the Flying Spaghetti Monster is a rather vague and flexible concept (pun intended), it is impossible to conclusively prove its non-existence. Hence a distinct possibility remains that it does in actual fact exist.
Of course the same proof can quite easily be applied to Jesus as we do not know for sure what Jesus claimed about himself, but the use of the present tense in your claim makes it rather harder as Jesus would have to at a minimum still exist but then a gain the definition of the entity referred to as Jesus is almost as flexible as that of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.