@josephw saidHis answer is, "What I say, not what they say."
So which one do you believe is the correct method for Bible study?
And why?
I just wish he'd come out with it and stop beating around the bush. One who has the courage of his own convictions shouldn't be afraid of expounding them both generally and specifically.
@indonesia-phil saidNone of the miracles in the Bible were subjective. They were all "on the ground" and "in your face". When Moses spoke to the burning bush and received the tablets from God, there wasn't much room for him to say, "No, that didn't happen just now."
Religion requires belief, belief is subjective, therefore religion is subjective. There's no such animal as objective religion.
@suzianne saidHow do you know any of the miracles happened? You don't, of course, you may believe that they happened, but belief is subjective.
None of the miracles in the Bible were subjective. They were all "on the ground" and "in your face". When Moses spoke to the burning bush and received the tablets from God, there wasn't much room for him to say, "No, that didn't happen just now."
@suzianne saidYour belief that these events actually happened - as written down by Hebrews decades, centuries and even millenia after they supposedly took place - is entirely within the realm of your personal subjectivity.
None of the miracles in the Bible were subjective. They were all "on the ground" and "in your face". When Moses spoke to the burning bush and received the tablets from God, there wasn't much room for him to say, "No, that didn't happen just now."
@suzianne saiddivegeester has been demonstrating the "courage of his own convictions" and "expounding them both generally and specifically" for over a decade. Have you not been reading his posts?
I just wish he'd come out with it and stop beating around the bush. One who has the courage of his own convictions shouldn't be afraid of expounding them both generally and specifically.