Originally posted by buckky
It has very little to do with a Book I read or anything .
I don't expect anybody else to see it my way .
I'm not trying to start my own religion.
Just one guy out there trying to make sense of the whole thing .
Religion has always left me flat in the end.
Reading books can only take you so far, and still you are trusting in someone else's opinion with all Holy Books .
Best for me to move ahead alone .
"It has very little to do with a Book I read or anything."
Ok, but I was trying to find out what it does have to do with, not what it doesn't have to do with.
I didn't automatically suppose it did have anything to do with a book, I want to understand where you are coming from and
discus that. Not decide where you are coming from and argue with a straw man.
"I don't expect anybody else to see it my way."
Well the existence or not of a god or gods, an afterlife or afterlives, of what the god or gods may want of us ect...
seem to me to be important issues of relevance to everyone.
If you are right then that would seem to be important, so shouldn't it be important what anyone and everyone else
thinks on the subject?
And if you can't demonstrate that your view is correct or worth following... doesn't that throw some doubt as to its trustworthiness?
"I'm not trying to start my own religion"
"Just one guy out there trying to make sense of the whole thing."
Ok, I am not accusing you of anything, just trying to understand your position and why you hold it.
"Religion has always left me flat in the end."
Do you mean organised religion?
What about religion [organised religion?] that 'leaves you flat' and in what way does it do this?
Do you have an actual belief in the existence of a god or gods?
"Reading books can only take you so far, and still you are trusting in someone else's opinion with all Holy Books."
Indeed, however...
I am a big fan of books and reading, and they are a great way of exploring a complex subject due to the depth and detail that
they can go into.
However any argument the author makes should be able to stand alone and be supported by logic and evidence.
Your belief in any argument that author makes should be based on the arguments validity and not on the authority of the author.
The rational, skeptical, and scientific tool-kit are specifically designed to address this (and other) issues.
When presenting an idea you should (in mathematical terms) show your working, so that people can see how you came to these
conclusions and what evidence you are using (or not using) to support them.
"Best for me to move ahead alone."
I am not sure quite what you mean by this, but I generally think that it's best to work with others.
Its far to easy to miss questions and reinforce ones own beliefs and opinions if not questioned and challenged by outside sources.
Also there is no point reinventing the wheel.
This is a subject that has been debated and discussed for millennia and many of the arguments and counter arguments are centuries old.
It makes sense to get up to speed on all the arguments made so far and start from there rather than starting completely from scratch.
I am curious to know more and to understand your position and beliefs.
I hope you can respond to this and expand on your views and explain them a little.