07 Apr '08 01:58>
I saw this article recently:
http://www.religionnewsblog.com/21008/followers-of-christ
It got me thinking about faith healing and other nonsensical and irresponsible ways of treating disease (including homeopathy, magnets, etc..).
The problem is that our society respects faith more than things like magnetic therapy, even though they are both equally (in)effective in treating ailments.
There are some faiths that suggest that they can't have a blood transfusion (I think it's jehovah's witnesses?).
In this case parents refused to use real medicine and turned their faith to faith healing and were charged. Under what cases is refusing medical treatment of any sort legitimate for a child using faith as a reason?
If you refuse your child a blood transfusion that would save their life, shouldn't you be charged too?
http://www.religionnewsblog.com/21008/followers-of-christ
It got me thinking about faith healing and other nonsensical and irresponsible ways of treating disease (including homeopathy, magnets, etc..).
The problem is that our society respects faith more than things like magnetic therapy, even though they are both equally (in)effective in treating ailments.
There are some faiths that suggest that they can't have a blood transfusion (I think it's jehovah's witnesses?).
In this case parents refused to use real medicine and turned their faith to faith healing and were charged. Under what cases is refusing medical treatment of any sort legitimate for a child using faith as a reason?
If you refuse your child a blood transfusion that would save their life, shouldn't you be charged too?