12 Sep '11 08:25>
What would it take to pursuade you of the NON-EXISTANCE of your god?
Originally posted by wolfgang59proving something doesn't exist is tricky
What would it take to pursuade you of the NON-EXISTANCE of your god?
Originally posted by ZahlanziAs someone who believes that you should have evidence FOR a position before believing in it, rather than
proving something doesn't exist is tricky
can you for example prove that the flying spaghetti monster doesn't exist?
granted, real science cannot work with "if something hasn't been proven not to exist, must exist". i agree that my position that god is real isn't backed up by anything more than faith and a vague historical figure in jesus, and i don't really mind.
Originally posted by Rajk999In answer to that I ask, "Do you think what someone believes matters?"
Why would you or anyone else for that matter want to 'pursuade'?
Originally posted by googlefudgeSomeones beliefs as an atheist has no bearing on me. I think that beliefs are a personal matter and I respect your right to believe that there is no God. What you believe matters to you not me, and viceversa.
In answer to that I ask, "Do you think what someone believes matters?"
The answer pretty much has to be yes, because people make decisions based on
their beliefs and those decisions can and do effect other people including you.
Which means the answer to the question is, "You might try to persuade people
to change their beliefs if you think those ...[text shortened]... unjustified and have
a negative impact on them, those around them, and society as a whole."
Originally posted by Rajk999I can think of one case: In the US 43 percent of the people don't believe in evolution.
Someones beliefs as an atheist has no bearing on me. I think that beliefs are a personal matter and I respect your right to believe that there is no God. What you believe matters to you not me, and viceversa.
Can you explain how a normal religious person impacts negatively on society? Please dont use exceptional cases of religious extremism to justify your conclusions.
Originally posted by googlefudgefaith.
As someone who believes that you should have evidence FOR a position before believing in it, rather than
believing in anything simply because there is no evidence to disprove it, I am genuinely curious as to why
you have a belief in god that you admit yourself you can't justify in terms of evidence?
Why is it that you believe in the god of the bibl ...[text shortened]... you decide what things you have no evidence to believe in, to believe, and what not to believe?
Originally posted by Rajk999Sure...
Someones beliefs as an atheist has no bearing on me. I think that beliefs are a personal matter and I respect your right to believe that there is no God. What you believe matters to you not me, and viceversa.
Can you explain how a normal religious person impacts negatively on society? Please dont use exceptional cases of religious extremism to justify your conclusions.
Originally posted by Zahlanzihmm, several points....
faith.
not that different than believing that in the end, goodness will prevail in the world. or that love is real. sure, i don't bet my life on either to be true. i will never propose a god-powered airplane. however the quality of my life improves if i believe in god. god comforts me.
as far as why do i believe in jesus? christianity appeals to me. ...[text shortened]... suitable to me. it is just another version of the truth, just like judaism, budhism, etc are.
Originally posted by wolfgang59When one recognises that no entity whatsoever,
What would it take to pursuade you of the NON-EXISTANCE of your god?
Originally posted by Rajk999The 'normal' religious person, if such a being exists, actively tries to indoctrinate their children in their beliefs, actively fights against critical thinking, and encourages religious extremism.
Can you explain how a normal religious person impacts negatively on society? Please dont use exceptional cases of religious extremism to justify your conclusions.
Originally posted by Zahlanzi... but your belief must be based on something? Even if its a "gut feeling".
proving something doesn't exist is tricky
can you for example prove that the flying spaghetti monster doesn't exist?
granted, real science cannot work with "if something hasn't been proven not to exist, must exist". i agree that my position that god is real isn't backed up by anything more than faith and a vague historical figure in jesus, and i don't really mind.
Originally posted by wolfgang59it's ok, i have read some of your previous posts and i know you have no bad intentions. i enjoy discussing my faith with someone who doesn't resort to "you're stupid" or "you're a heretic that will burn in hell".
... but your belief must be based on something? Even if its a "gut feeling".
I have posed a similar question to atheists - I'm interested in what it takes to change ones mind ... we arevery stubborn creatures aren't we?!?!
This is not a theist-bashing thread!!! (Or at least I dont want it to become one)