20 Mar '16 12:06>2 edits
Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
If God believed a woman's hand should be cut off for pulling her husbands private parts 3500 years ago (and is indeed unchanging) then he still believes a woman's hand should be cut off for pulling her husbands private parts. - Yes, Sonship put forward a very articulate explanation about the overriding importance of procreation at the time of Deut 25, but in an unchanging God, this still reflects very badly (for this atheist at least) on the nature of this God who would advocate such harsh measures.
If God does exist, i personally believe He would be horrified that people were linking him in any way to passages like Deu 25 which are clearly written, not just by man, but by primitive man with primitive attitudes towards both justice and woman.
And God still believes that He has provided the sin offering, the trespass offering, the peace offering, the consecration offering, the meal offering, the drink offering for people to be reconciled to God though they have done hated things.
You see, all or the offerings prescribed for the priests were types of Christ as the all-inclusive atoning offering saving us from what God hates.
So you have a couple of things going on here in the law of Moses. You have God revealing His hatred for sin and you also have God prescribing offerings to atone for sin and reconcile people to God.
Don't forget all the offerings.