10 Apr '17 22:54>
Seems to me the topic is what's important.
Originally posted by divegeesterWhy don't you give him a break?
I am having a disagreement with sonship over his use of other people's "reworded" ministries in this forum without given the originator the credit. I feel that this is poor forum ettiquete.
Taking another person's ministry or spiritual teaching and passing it off as your own, no matter how much "rewording" has been done, is intellectual theft and plagiarism.
Correct or incorrect?
Originally posted by chaney3Every time I see a divegeester thread Elvis pops into my mind and starts signing Hound dog, 'divegeester you ain't nuthin but a hound dog, crying all the time! - True story.
Why don't you give him a break?
He is SO much more interested in helping Christians than you have ever shown Dive.
What have you done?
The answer is....nothing!!!
Originally posted by wolfgang59No, it's just a view.
That is a very narrow view of plagiarism.
You can plagiarise someone's ideas without directly quoting them;
it is intellectual theft.
You think re-writing the Harry Potter books would be legal without permission?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSonship provides value and teaching.
Every time I see a divegeester thread Elvis pops into my mind and starts signing Hound dog, 'divegeester you ain't nuthin but a hound dog, crying all the time! - True story.
Originally posted by sonshipKeep up the good work sonship.
You all are making me feel self conscious.
I don't want you to see me. I want you all to see [b] Jesus, to see Jesus, to see Jesus.
You all have an opportunity to be a part of something too great. We can bring back the Lord Jesus to this earth.
If you don't want to get saved for yourself, get saved to be a part of this corporat ...[text shortened]... gnificant.
The Lord's recovery -
http://www.lordsrecovery.org/ [/b]
Originally posted by sonshipMy advice to you is:
What NONSENSE is this? That is that I am trying to establish sonship as some original source of truth. My joy and reward is that after I write something someone dusts off his Bible and decides - " I think I will go to see what is in there after all."
Originally posted by sonshipThis is more likely to happen if you exhibit the real life value and impact on your Christian character and make people want to emulate you or tap into the perspectives, applications, the joy that Jesus instills in you. The most admirable and affecting Christians I have known use their faith as a Biblical prism through which to adjudge what to DO in life, how to INTERACT with others, how to CHANGE things around you, and so on and so forth. You are forever using your Biblical prism to look at your own Biblical prism.
If I influence one reader to dust off their Bible and read with a heart turned to God, I am overjoyed in my prayers for you.
Originally posted by divegeesterIt's been well-known for some time now that he is a student of Watchman Nee and Witness Lee and Living Stream Ministries.
I think you may be misunderstanding (possibly deliberately) my point here. I have suspected for a long time that the sermons/teachings/lectures which sonship posts in here contain core topic material from another source; he has admitted as much in one of the current threads. I feel these sources, or indeed, source, should be acknowledged. Do you agree?
Originally posted by FMFAnd now your words. "This is a debate and discussion board."
My advice to you is:
[1] Don't treat this facility as if it were your personal blog filled with monologues and regurgitation of material you like which sometimes make you seem like a spammer..
[2] Simply post links to the material you parrot (and often bristle when asked questions about), and then
[3] Enter into genuine debates and discussions (which is ...[text shortened]... And I think it would add more value to this debate and discussion forum. Just my penny's worth.
Originally posted by chaney3Just like you.
Keep up the good work sonship.
Dive is jealous because he is keenly aware that he himself provides Nothing to help his fellow Christian.
I see through Dive in the same way I see through FMF. They both provide nothing, and contribute nothing.
Originally posted by divegeesterNew to you, you mean. This teaching has been around a long time.
I agree that historical Christian biblical doctrine and teaching, such as Calvinism or Lutharism is open to generalised discussion, but when something apparently new is presented, which was initially penned by another contemporary minister, then that minister should be acknowledged as the originator in the ministry. It's about (spiritual) intellectual integrity.
Originally posted by SuzianneFMF is an ex-christian looking to undermine the faith at every opportunity. He no longer believes, and wishes to condemn others that do.
And now your words. "This is a debate and discussion board."
Don't like it? Don't participate. Or do you seriously think people here are beholden to your rules?
Oh, wait, I see now. You don't agree with him, and so you think you can do all you can to diminish his "influence" here. Haven't you filled this forum with similar accusations of others protesting your own "influence-peddling"? Kind of hypocritical, no?