28 Dec '18 19:32>
@divegeester saidBoth you little rugrats have been busy with your shovels trying uncover some connection, any connection, between these two.
Here’s one: Game 12098725
For several reasons.
@suzianne saidYou seem upset by this suzianne.
Both you little rugrats have been busy with your shovels trying uncover some connection, any connection, between these two.
And this is the best you got?
Good enough for your medieval fantasyland, I suppose.
@suzianne said"Medieval"?
Both you little rugrats have been busy with your shovels trying uncover some connection, any connection, between these two.
And this is the best you got?
Good enough for your medieval fantasyland, I suppose.
@divegeester saidDoes this prove something?
Here’s one: Game 12098725
For several reasons.
@divegeester saidA tense struggle for the centre with both sides having
Here’s one: Game 12098725
@wolfgang59 saidI was devastated. 😨
A tense struggle for the centre with both sides having
chances until a brilliancy by black finished the game.
Very instructive ... thanks for sharing.
@secondson saidOf course not, it’s just interesting to observe Joseph.
Does this prove something?
@secondson saidYou see, I don’t think you were “devestated”, not in the slightest.
I was devastated. 😨
@philokalia saidThe game of chess was "ridiculous", I agree.
Dive, this is ridiculous on multiple levels.
@suzianne saidJust me “spewing troll venom” Suzianne. 🙂
And this is the best you got?
@philokalia saidThank goodness for your politeness Jacob.
Dive, this is ridiculous on multiple levels.
I won't go into it because I am politer than that.
@suzianne saidStill think it’s “fantasyland” Suzianne?
Good enough for your medieval fantasyland, I suppose.
@fmf saidIf you think it was a "one-off", then why did you include a completely different game in your own thread in the Only Chess forum?
What was "ridiculous" was that one-off game that divegeester cited in the OP.