03 Nov '16 19:20>
Ghost, your particular brand of atheism is intriguing to me. You have studied theology at a university level, and are not convinced of God, but you have repeatedly said that you are 'open minded' to God, if the proof were revealed to you.
The issue here though, is that absent of 'god', you seem quite content that earth and humanity just happened, and was not created. Not only do you not believe in God, but you also do not believe in 'creation'.
If God did somehow reveal Himself to you today, you would have no alternative but believe in BOTH scenarios, that God exists....and that He created all.
So, why now, with the absence of proof of God, can you not entertain that all was 'created', but by what.....you don't know?
Meaning.....that your high level of theology studies may not convince you of the 'God of the bible', but to still not believe in some form of 'creation' is entirely different.
The issue here though, is that absent of 'god', you seem quite content that earth and humanity just happened, and was not created. Not only do you not believe in God, but you also do not believe in 'creation'.
If God did somehow reveal Himself to you today, you would have no alternative but believe in BOTH scenarios, that God exists....and that He created all.
So, why now, with the absence of proof of God, can you not entertain that all was 'created', but by what.....you don't know?
Meaning.....that your high level of theology studies may not convince you of the 'God of the bible', but to still not believe in some form of 'creation' is entirely different.