Ghost and Atheism

Originally posted by chaney3
And??????

He did.

What is your problem here A-hole????

So quote what he said that substantiates this, and stop blithering on in your usual idiotic manner.

Originally posted by divegeester
So quote what he said that substantiates this, and stop blithering on in your usual idiotic manner.

He said a creator is possible, more than once.

You are a total idiot for asking this, for it's all over this thread.

I will await your apology.

Originally posted by chaney3
He said a creator is possible, more than once.

You are a total idiot for asking this, for it's all over this thread.

I will await your apology.

Quote twhitehead where he said this;

"life may be attributed to a creator."

Originally posted by divegeester
Quote twhitehead where said this;

"life may be attributed to a creator."

It's on page 2 dip$hit.

I will await your apology, if you're man enough.

Originally posted by chaney3
It's on page 2 dip$hit.

I will await your apology, if you're man enough.

Then quote him big-mouth.

Originally posted by divegeester
Then quote him big-mouth.

Dive.....go to fuc#king page 2 and read it!!!

What the hell is your problem here?

I will await your apology.

Originally posted by chaney3
Dive.....go to fuc#king page 2 and read it!!!

What the hell is your problem here?

I will await your apology.

Just quote him, big-mouth.

Originally posted by divegeester
Just quote him, big-mouth.

Okay, I will look at page 2 myself and quote him because you are retarted.

Stand by dip$hit.

Originally posted by chaney3
Okay, I will look at page 2 myself and quote him because you are retarted.

Stand by dip$hit.

No.

Twitehead, please tell the dip$hit Dive that you believe creation is possible.

Originally posted by chaney3
No.

Twitehead, please tell the dip$hit Dive that you believe creation is possible.

That's not what you claim he said.

There is a big difference between generally saying that creation is a possibility, and stating that "life may have been created".

The former provides room for possibility, the later implies that the evidence infers it. You're inability to see the difference reveals your limited intelligence.

Originally posted by divegeester
That's not what you claim he said.

There is a big difference between generally saying that creation is a possibility, and stating that "life may have been created".

The former provides room for possibility, the later implies that the evidence infers it. You're inability to see the difference reveals your limited intelligence.

Wrong.

Just the possibility of creation is all that's needed.

Originally posted by chaney3
Wrong.

Just the possibility of creation is all that's needed.

I'm not wrong; you are just a bit dim.

Originally posted by divegeester
I'm not wrong; you are just a bit dim.

Dive, for the 20th time, you can just look at page 2 yourself.

What the hell is your problem?

Both Ghost and Twitehead are not far from being theists.

A simple belief in a 'creator' is all that is necessary.

Originally posted by chaney3
Dive, for the 20th time, you can just look at page 2 yourself.

What the hell is your problem?

Im just waiting for you to quote twhitehead, Fetchmyjunk.