Go back
God

God

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
You are a coward and afraid to hear the truth.
Nope, that's still you.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
You are a coward and afraid to hear the truth.
And THE TRUTH according to RJHinds is ......?

Before answering, please remember a TRUTH is a FACT, a TRUISM, something which can be PROVED and VERIFIED.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Pianoman1
And THE TRUTH according to RJHinds is ......?

Before answering, please remember a TRUTH is a FACT, a TRUISM, something which can be PROVED and VERIFIED.
Christ! HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Christ! HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! 😏
Can't be proved or verified.

Not a fact.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
Can't be proved or verified.

Not a fact.
It has already been proved by His resurrection, which is a verifiable fact.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Is Intelligent Design Scientific ?

(Disqualifying Theories that we don't like)

Dr. Stephen Meyer.

&feature=related

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
It has already been proved by His resurrection, which is a verifiable fact.
mythology isn't verifiable facts.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
mythology isn't verifiable facts.
The Shroud of Turin is not mythology. It is history.

http://www.shroudofturin4journalists.com/history.htm

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
The Shroud of Turin is not mythology. It is history.

http://www.shroudofturin4journalists.com/history.htm
1) You're right. The shroud IS history, about 1400's by all accounts - certainly not proven to be Jesus' shroud.
2) Excuse me? The resurrection is a verifiable fact? Did I miss something? Since when?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Pianoman1
1) You're right. The shroud IS history, about 1400's by all accounts - certainly not proven to be Jesus' shroud.
2) Excuse me? The resurrection is a verifiable fact? Did I miss something? Since when?
You have apparently missed a lot. So start reading.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Old Earth Creationist Dr. Hugh Ross, discusses book

Why The Universe is the Way It Is

&feature=related

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jaywill
Old Earth Creationist Dr. Hugh Ross, discusses book

[b]Why The Universe is the Way It Is

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zWd_FuFWFM&feature=related[/b]
Scientific evedence for a young earth

&feature=related

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Scientific evedence for a young earth
where?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
You have apparently missed a lot. So start reading.
Delighted to. Perhaps you can point me in the right direction. In which book exactly is the Reurrection proven to be a verifiable fact? Certainly not the Bible or the Apocrypha..

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jaywill
Is Intelligent Design Scientific ?

(Disqualifying Theories that we don't like)

Dr. Stephen Meyer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hy0_Mn1s1xo&feature=related
He specifically mentioned that people object to ID as untestable and then provided no counterexample that evolution was similarly untestable. Instead, his only counterexample was that of unobservable entities. 😞

I kind of thought testability was a big thing for scientists. Galileo, Newton, Einstein, etc. were all able to give us theories with testable predictions.

I would like to see a specific testable prediction made by ID theory; something comparable to this:



Please note that the guy is a theist and is NOT against Intelligent Design as a CONCEPT, because that is perfectly compatible with evolution. The trouble is only with the so-called ID THEORY, which has been invented specifically to discredit evolution and not so much to make positive claims of its own.