01 Mar '15 23:26>
If there were no religions, and humans began to take care of each other purely because it was in our best interests to do so, would he/she/it be content?
Originally posted by OdBodI don't know what your question really means.
If there were no religions, and humans began to take care of each other purely because it was in our best interests to do so, would he/she/it be content?
Originally posted by OdBodI've had people do that to me on all sorts of issues, I don't think theists have any particular monopoly on refusing to consider counter-factual scenarios.
It's as I thought, religious people seem unable to think outside their box. Still, that's one of the reasons scientific thinking is in the ascendency and religious thinking will in the end die out,as it has no way expanding beyond its dogma defined limitations.
Originally posted by OdBodIt's as I thought, atheists are stuck in their ideological ivory tower; they are unable to look at the evidence from the real world and admit that atheism doesn't automatically make you a moral person - quite the opposite, in fact.
It's as I thought, religious people seem unable to think outside their box.
Originally posted by Shallow BlueHas anyone ever claimed that atheism automatically makes you a moral person? Or am I misunderstanding you?
It's as I thought, atheists are stuck in their ideological ivory tower; they are unable to look at the evidence from the real world and admit that atheism doesn't automatically make you a moral person - quite the opposite, in fact.