31 Mar '14 14:17>
Originally posted by FMFAh...
Nothing's wrong with it. There is no harm in it. But FreakyKBH seems to be denying that's that he's been doing it.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI mentioned stellspalfie, twhitehead, Proper Knob, SwissGambit and JS357 to name but five, in the hope you'd run their thoughtful efforts through your Christians-Mostly-Good-Atheists-Mostly-Bad prism.
I made a claim for which you provided ONE person who could fairly objectively be considered an exception to the stated rule.
The only way you can accurately refute the claim would be to give counter-examples of atheists doing the opposite of what I claim, i.e., behaving in a conciliatory manner toward the Christian message/messenger.
This you have (thus far, at least) failed to do.
Originally posted by FMFThese folks that you've mentioned--- and even LJ, despite the previous comparisons--- you're trying to say they've not been hostile and antagonistic against the Christian message?
I mentioned stellspalfie, twhitehead, Proper Knob, SwissGambit and JS357 to name but five, in the hope you'd run their thoughtful efforts through your Christians-Mostly-Good-Atheists-Mostly-Bad prism.
But you just basically ignored it ~ or, in fact, what you did was issue the following dismissive evasion: "I couldn't care less your view of it or any other co ...[text shortened]... clearly want to avoid being specific about people who post here. You have simply copped out. 🙂
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI am saying there is no more or less "reciprocity" or no more or less "conciliatory acceptance" towards the 'other side's' message or delivery on the part of those six atheists I have mentioned than there would be on the part of any six Christian regulars that you or I might cite as their counterparts in terms of forum contributions.
These folks that you've mentioned--- and even LJ, despite the previous comparisons--- you're trying to say they've not been hostile and antagonistic against the Christian message?
Seriously?!?
Originally posted by FMFOne way to prove your point...
I am saying there is no more or less "reciprocity" or no more or less "conciliatory acceptance" towards the 'other side's' message or delivery on the part of those six atheists I have mentioned than there would be on the part of any six Christian regulars that you or I might cite as their counterparts in terms of forum contributions.
There has been a fair bi ...[text shortened]... ong the atheists].
All you've been doing is rooting for your 'team' by making assertions. 🙂
Originally posted by FreakyKBHThe point you've attempted to make is yours ~ and it's yours to prove.
One way to prove your point...
Originally posted by FMFI contend that your assessment is based more upon your failure to pay attention than it is a better perspective.
The point you've attempted to make is yours ~ and it's yours to prove.
My observations of Christian-Atheist similarities/contrasts regarding "conciliatory acceptance towards the other side's message or delivery" do not corroborate your claims.
Note that I am not rooting for either side. I am saying that the two sides are much of a muchness. You have not demonstrated to me or ~ I think ~ anyone that your assertions hold any water. 🙂