@ghost-of-a-duke saidBut if your vindictiveness in your private club was rooted in you getting people muddled up, then... oh dear. I mean, really. Oh dear.
It's easily done.
@fmf saidBut your story has change a number of times. At first it was done to give the impression there were more writers on the show (strange then to use an identifiable spoonerism and not am anonymous pseudonym) and then it was just done in fun (strange to do so at at time there was absolutely no fun between us).
I have always been completely honest about why I put two of your stories in the show and why I used a tongue in cheek pseudonym.
1 edit
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThe email was sent to an address that is accessed by dozens of people, including me, and it was full of untrue accusations. If people here saw it, would you be vindicated or would you feel stabbed in the back?
Do you think it is ok to share personal emails or contents from a private club in a public forum?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYes it was done light-heartedly. The "story" has never changed. Obviously Bill and I and Phil could have written the whole show if we'd wanted to. We had just two each, though, using some silly names, and I put two of yours in too. It's just a fun show.
But your story has change a number of times. At first it was done to give the impression there were more writers on the show (strange then to use an identifiable spoonerism and not am anonymous pseudonym) and then it was just done in fun (strange to do so at at time there was absolutely no fun between us).
@ghost-of-a-duke saidBut your accusations were invalid.
But there was no muddling up. I made the valid assumption you had acted together,...as you are doing now. As you always do.