Gratification

@fmf said
I didn't ignore any emails that warranted action or a reply.

Yes you did. 2 of them. The second contained a question.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Your action should have been to ask for consent, surely?

Did you not contact me so that you could then do the most vindictive thing you could think of?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Yes you did. 2 of them. The second contained a question.

You are lying.

@fmf said
Did you not contact me so that you could then do the most vindictive thing you could think of?

Why do you gloss over the fact that you acted without my consent or letting me know what you were going to do?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
It was an email relating to stories submitted by a writer to a show. Why on Earth would my job provide any gravitas. It was clearly a personal matter. I wasn't writing on behalf of the Prime Minister.

When the station realized that you were just a backstabbing nobody from the internet, the fact you'd used an official government email address was part of what made you look like a creep. And so the radio shows were restored.

@fmf said
You are lying.

Why do you always resort to that? Do you even remember the two messages?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Why do you gloss over the fact that you acted without my consent or letting me know what you were going to do?

I'm not. There was nothing vindictive about it. And yet not raising it with me and instead contacting the station behind my back was sheer vindictiveness.

-Removed-

I never thought you would. I wouldn't do likewise.

Ditto on the latter.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Why do you always resort to that? Do you even remember the two messages?

I read them last week when I dug out the letter to the radio station. No messages that required action and nothing that required a reply.

Why didn't you warn me that you were going to write directly to the radio station? Why did you keep that secret?

-Removed-

Part of the trust I put in FMF was in giving him access to my family, via the broadcasts they listened to. This is why he should have asked for my consent before spoonerizing my name on live radio. You may think it silly, but it did cause confusion and embarrassment. It appeared I was on a show that couldn't even get my name right. - Why was it ok for FMF to do that? He says he found it funny. Does that make it ok then?

@fmf said
I read them last week when I dug out the letter to the radio station. No messages that required action and nothing that required a reply.

Why didn't you warn me that you were going to write directly to the radio station? Why did you keep that secret?

Yikes, caught in a lie. The second message was via RHP which you deleted without replying to. How did you read that last week?