16 Dec 07
1 edit
Originally posted by LivingForJesusSeriously, this guy is an idiot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiNS_e5yJJU
this is a great viedo please tell me what you think I saw it on youtube and thought it was great!!
The first step in his proof of God's existence is to assume that God exists. He says this explicitly! (See time 2:02).
16 Dec 07
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesI really can't take any more of this. I've heard him out through several steps, and each is fallacious. The "most translated book must be the truest" argument is absurd.
Seriously, this guy is an idiot.
The first step in his proof of God's existence is to assume that God exists. He says this explicitly! (See time 2:02).
16 Dec 07
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesI don't get what you are getting at! Can't you see that the Bible is proven fact!?
I really can't take any more of this. I've heard him out through several steps, and each is fallacious. The "most translated book must be the truest" argument is absurd.
16 Dec 07
1 edit
Originally posted by LivingForJesusI'll tell you what. Present the speaker's argument in your own words, and if you're willing to put in that effort, I'll meet you halfway and walk you through the fallacies.
I don't get what you are getting at! Can't you see that the Bible is proven fact!?
16 Dec 07
Originally posted by LivingForJesusThat guy is nuts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiNS_e5yJJU
this is a great viedo please tell me what you think I saw it on youtube and thought it was great!!
this is antthor good one!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDpnAqxYeGU&feature=related
PLEASE COMMENT!!🙂
For a start,he claims that the OT says the Messiah will be born in Bethlehem. It doesn't. He claims, because it's popular, that's right. Not true. He claims that the destruction of the 2nd temple, which apparently happened in 70AD was "right after Jesus' crucifixion" - well, yeah, if you consider 40 years "right after". He claims a whole heap of stuff for which there is no basis in reality.