Go back
Gullible fools...

Gullible fools...

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Halitose
I see you are still using your best (and I am sometimes tempted to think, only) means of rebuttal: ad hominem
You use 'ad hominem' ad nausea.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Halitose
Facts? Who are you to judge whether somebody's experience with God is or is not susbtantial enough to warrant a belief in Him?
Fact remains that he (KYJelly) is so embarrassed about the ridiculousness of his (imagined) experience of God, that he cannot talk about it!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
You use 'ad hominem' ad nausea.
How ironic. We are both using ad hominems to prove the other is using 'em. I rest my case.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
I forgot that Kelly Jay claims to have personally experienced God.

Unfortunately his 'experience' is so ridiculous that he is embarrassed to explain it.

Keep on clinging to those slim threads of evidence, you God botherers!
Matthew 7:6 - Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.