25 Nov '05 03:35>
Originally posted by HalitoseYou use 'ad hominem' ad nausea.
I see you are still using your best (and I am sometimes tempted to think, only) means of rebuttal: ad hominem
Originally posted by HalitoseFact remains that he (KYJelly) is so embarrassed about the ridiculousness of his (imagined) experience of God, that he cannot talk about it!
Facts? Who are you to judge whether somebody's experience with God is or is not susbtantial enough to warrant a belief in Him?
Originally posted by howardgeeMatthew 7:6 - Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
I forgot that Kelly Jay claims to have personally experienced God.
Unfortunately his 'experience' is so ridiculous that he is embarrassed to explain it.
Keep on clinging to those slim threads of evidence, you God botherers!