1. Cosmos
    Joined
    21 Jan '04
    Moves
    11184
    25 Nov '05 03:35
    Originally posted by Halitose
    I see you are still using your best (and I am sometimes tempted to think, only) means of rebuttal: ad hominem
    You use 'ad hominem' ad nausea.
  2. Cosmos
    Joined
    21 Jan '04
    Moves
    11184
    25 Nov '05 03:37
    Originally posted by Halitose
    Facts? Who are you to judge whether somebody's experience with God is or is not susbtantial enough to warrant a belief in Him?
    Fact remains that he (KYJelly) is so embarrassed about the ridiculousness of his (imagined) experience of God, that he cannot talk about it!
  3. Standard memberHalitose
    I stink, ergo I am
    On the rebound
    Joined
    14 Jul '05
    Moves
    4464
    25 Nov '05 06:26
    Originally posted by howardgee
    You use 'ad hominem' ad nausea.
    How ironic. We are both using ad hominems to prove the other is using 'em. I rest my case.
  4. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    25 Nov '05 07:15
    Originally posted by howardgee
    I forgot that Kelly Jay claims to have personally experienced God.

    Unfortunately his 'experience' is so ridiculous that he is embarrassed to explain it.

    Keep on clinging to those slim threads of evidence, you God botherers!
    Matthew 7:6 - Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree