...So yet another virgin mary weeps - it's a miracle!
http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_325194429.html
They wiped away the tears, fearing it was a hoax, but the tears came back again on the weekend.
Well, that proves it can't be a hoax then. It can't be that the pranksters came back at the weekend or anyhting!
All this goes to prove is that religious people are so desperate for some evidence, any evidence whatsoever to support their flimsy beleif system ,that they will cling to any posibility.
It sure must be hard living life on blind faith and trust with no perceptible reason for your beleifs.
Originally posted by howardgeeYou do play chess here correct?
...So yet another virgin mary weeps - it's a miracle!
http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_325194429.html
They wiped away the tears, fearing it was a hoax, but the tears came back again on the weekend.
Well, that proves it can't be a hoax then. It can't be that the pranksters came back at the weekend or anyhting!
All this goes to prove is ...[text shortened]... e must be hard living life on blind faith and trust with no perceptible reason for your beleifs.
Have you ever missed a great move for or against you?
You not seeing something does not mean it isn't there.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayWhat does this have to do with anything?
You do play chess here correct?
Have you ever missed a great move for or against you?
You not seeing something does not mean it isn't there.
Kelly
This is about seeing something which is not there. (i.e. a weeping Virgin Mary which has been faked).
Originally posted by howardgeeMy personal testamony for myself proves to me a evidence.
...So yet another virgin mary weeps - it's a miracle!
http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_325194429.html
They wiped away the tears, fearing it was a hoax, but the tears came back again on the weekend.
Well, that proves it can't be a hoax then. It can't be that the pranksters came back at the weekend or anyhting!
All this goes to prove is ...[text shortened]... e must be hard living life on blind faith and trust with no perceptible reason for your beleifs.
Originally posted by StarrmanIf so, maybe it can be un-babelfished? Let's see...
Are you using Babelfish?
"My personal certification for me examines a proof to me."
(RBHillish (corrected for spelling mistake) to German to English)
"My private proof because your own itself prove evidence to me."
(RBHillish to Japanese to English)
"My personal explanation for me proves an evidence with me."
(RBHillish to Dutch to French to German to English)
I think I haven't found the right combination yet.
Originally posted by KellyJayI forgot that Kelly Jay claims to have personally experienced God.
You do play chess here correct?
Have you ever missed a great move for or against you?
You not seeing something does not mean it isn't there.
Kelly
Unfortunately his 'experience' is so ridiculous that he is embarrassed to explain it.
Keep on clinging to those slim threads of evidence, you God botherers!
Originally posted by howardgeeQuestion: Why is the Virgin always weeping if "God's in His Heaven and all's well with the world"?
...So yet another virgin mary weeps - it's a miracle!
http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_325194429.html
They wiped away the tears, fearing it was a hoax, but the tears came back again on the weekend.
Well, that proves it can't be a hoax then. It can't be that the pranksters came back at the weekend or anyhting!
All this goes to prove is ...[text shortened]... e must be hard living life on blind faith and trust with no perceptible reason for your beleifs.
Things are going according to plan, aren't they?
I mean, isn't it all written?
Originally posted by howardgeeWhen it comes to weeping statues, I am also a skeptic. Sometimes there are perfectly natural explanations. As you centend that is has been faked, do you have any proof for this assumption?
What does this have to do with anything?
This is about seeing something which is not there. (i.e. a weeping Virgin Mary which has been faked).
1 edit
Originally posted by howardgeeI see you are still using your best (and I am sometimes tempted to think, only) means of rebuttal: ad hominem
I forgot that Kelly Jay claims to have personally experienced God.
Unfortunately his 'experience' is so ridiculous that he is embarrassed to explain it.
Keep on clinging to those slim threads of evidence, you God botherers!
Originally posted by howardgeeGee, Howard ..... 😲
...So yet another virgin mary weeps - it's a miracle!
http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_325194429.html
They wiped away the tears, fearing it was a hoax, but the tears came back again on the weekend.
Well, that proves it can't be a hoax then. It can't be that the pranksters came back at the weekend or anyhting!
All this goes to prove is ...[text shortened]... e must be hard living life on blind faith and trust with no perceptible reason for your beleifs.
Fallacy: Hasty Generalization
Also Known as: Fallacy of Insufficient Statistics, Fallacy of Insufficient Sample, Leaping to A Conclusion, Hasty Induction
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/hasty-generalization.html
2 edits
Originally posted by howardgeeAgain ! 😲
I forgot that Kelly Jay claims to have personally experienced God.
Unfortunately his 'experience' is so ridiculous that he is embarrassed to explain it.
Keep on clinging to those slim threads of evidence, you God botherers!
Fallacy: Hasty Generalization
Also Known as: Fallacy of Insufficient Statistics, Fallacy of Insufficient Sample, Leaping to A Conclusion, Hasty Induction
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/hasty-generalization.html