Gullible fools...

...So yet another virgin mary weeps - it's a miracle!

http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_325194429.html

They wiped away the tears, fearing it was a hoax, but the tears came back again on the weekend.
Well, that proves it can't be a hoax then. It can't be that the pranksters came back at the weekend or anyhting!

All this goes to prove is that religious people are so desperate for some evidence, any evidence whatsoever to support their flimsy beleif system ,that they will cling to any posibility.

It sure must be hard living life on blind faith and trust with no perceptible reason for your beleifs.

Originally posted by howardgee
...So yet another virgin mary weeps - it's a miracle!

http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_325194429.html

They wiped away the tears, fearing it was a hoax, but the tears came back again on the weekend.
Well, that proves it can't be a hoax then. It can't be that the pranksters came back at the weekend or anyhting!

All this goes to prove is ...[text shortened]... e must be hard living life on blind faith and trust with no perceptible reason for your beleifs.

You do play chess here correct?

Have you ever missed a great move for or against you?

You not seeing something does not mean it isn't there.
Kelly

Originally posted by KellyJay
You do play chess here correct?

Have you ever missed a great move for or against you?

You not seeing something does not mean it isn't there.
Kelly

What does this have to do with anything?

This is about seeing something which is not there. (i.e. a weeping Virgin Mary which has been faked).

Originally posted by howardgee
What does this have to do with anything?

This is about seeing something which is not there. (i.e. a weeping Virgin Mary which has been faked).

I agree.

Originally posted by howardgee
...So yet another virgin mary weeps - it's a miracle!

http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_325194429.html

They wiped away the tears, fearing it was a hoax, but the tears came back again on the weekend.
Well, that proves it can't be a hoax then. It can't be that the pranksters came back at the weekend or anyhting!

All this goes to prove is ...[text shortened]... e must be hard living life on blind faith and trust with no perceptible reason for your beleifs.

My personal testamony for myself proves to me a evidence.

Originally posted by RBHILL
My personal testamony for myself proves to me a evidence.

Are you using Babelfish?

Originally posted by Starrman
Are you using Babelfish?

If so, maybe it can be un-babelfished? Let's see...

"My personal certification for me examines a proof to me."
(RBHillish (corrected for spelling mistake) to German to English)

"My private proof because your own itself prove evidence to me."
(RBHillish to Japanese to English)

"My personal explanation for me proves an evidence with me."
(RBHillish to Dutch to French to German to English)

I think I haven't found the right combination yet.

Originally posted by KellyJay
You do play chess here correct?

Have you ever missed a great move for or against you?

You not seeing something does not mean it isn't there.
Kelly

I forgot that Kelly Jay claims to have personally experienced God.

Unfortunately his 'experience' is so ridiculous that he is embarrassed to explain it.

Keep on clinging to those slim threads of evidence, you God botherers!

Originally posted by howardgee
...So yet another virgin mary weeps - it's a miracle!

http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_325194429.html

They wiped away the tears, fearing it was a hoax, but the tears came back again on the weekend.
Well, that proves it can't be a hoax then. It can't be that the pranksters came back at the weekend or anyhting!

All this goes to prove is ...[text shortened]... e must be hard living life on blind faith and trust with no perceptible reason for your beleifs.

Question: Why is the Virgin always weeping if "God's in His Heaven and all's well with the world"?
Things are going according to plan, aren't they?
I mean, isn't it all written?

Originally posted by howardgee
What does this have to do with anything?

This is about seeing something which is not there. (i.e. a weeping Virgin Mary which has been faked).

When it comes to weeping statues, I am also a skeptic. Sometimes there are perfectly natural explanations. As you centend that is has been faked, do you have any proof for this assumption?

Originally posted by howardgee
I forgot that Kelly Jay claims to have personally experienced God.

Unfortunately his 'experience' is so ridiculous that he is embarrassed to explain it.

Keep on clinging to those slim threads of evidence, you God botherers!

I see you are still using your best (and I am sometimes tempted to think, only) means of rebuttal: ad hominem

Originally posted by Halitose
I see you are still using your best (and I am sometimes tempted to think, only) means of rebuttal: ad hominem

merely stating the facts.

Originally posted by howardgee
merely stating the facts.

Facts? Who are you to judge whether somebody's experience with God is or is not susbtantial enough to warrant a belief in Him?

Originally posted by howardgee
...So yet another virgin mary weeps - it's a miracle!

http://cbs13.com/topstories/local_story_325194429.html

They wiped away the tears, fearing it was a hoax, but the tears came back again on the weekend.
Well, that proves it can't be a hoax then. It can't be that the pranksters came back at the weekend or anyhting!

All this goes to prove is ...[text shortened]... e must be hard living life on blind faith and trust with no perceptible reason for your beleifs.

Gee, Howard ..... 😲

Fallacy: Hasty Generalization

Also Known as: Fallacy of Insufficient Statistics, Fallacy of Insufficient Sample, Leaping to A Conclusion, Hasty Induction


http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/hasty-generalization.html

Originally posted by howardgee
I forgot that Kelly Jay claims to have personally experienced God.

Unfortunately his 'experience' is so ridiculous that he is embarrassed to explain it.

Keep on clinging to those slim threads of evidence, you God botherers!

Again ! 😲


Fallacy: Hasty Generalization

Also Known as: Fallacy of Insufficient Statistics, Fallacy of Insufficient Sample, Leaping to A Conclusion, Hasty Induction


http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/hasty-generalization.html