13 Jul '07 23:15>
I was perusing Scripture and came upon the following:
...Any man who prays or propehsies with his head covered brings shame
upon his head. But a woman who prays or prophesies with her head
unveiled brings shame upon her head, for it is one in the same thing as
if she had had her head shaved...Judge for yourselves: is it proper for
a woman to pray to God with her head unveiled? Does not nature itself
teach you that if a man wears his hair long it is a disgrace to him, whereas
if a woman has long hair it is her glory, because long hair has been given
[her] for a covering? But if anyone is inclined to be argumentative, we
do not have such a custom, nor do the churches of God. (I Cor 11:4-5, 13-16)
Confer with the whole passage to get the full context.
So, what do we think of this? St Paul is appealling to 'nature' in his
argument, that it is natural that man ought not have his head covered
and woman ought to when praying, that this is parcel to being involved
in the 'churches of God.'
St Paul was writing in his time, of course. But, as 'Divine Revelation,' his
appeal to what is natural comes with greater authority. After all, if he is
speaking as mere conduit of 'God's Divine Will,' then the 'nature' of things
is as permanent as God is. It's not merely a local custom, but the ineffable
word of God.
So, how do Biblical literalists deal with such an issue? I'm certain I've
seldom seen women with covered heads in their churches. And what of
men like myself who have a ponytail? St Paul would have me believe
that his is a 'natural disgrace.'
What do Biblical literalists have to say about this?
Nemesio
...Any man who prays or propehsies with his head covered brings shame
upon his head. But a woman who prays or prophesies with her head
unveiled brings shame upon her head, for it is one in the same thing as
if she had had her head shaved...Judge for yourselves: is it proper for
a woman to pray to God with her head unveiled? Does not nature itself
teach you that if a man wears his hair long it is a disgrace to him, whereas
if a woman has long hair it is her glory, because long hair has been given
[her] for a covering? But if anyone is inclined to be argumentative, we
do not have such a custom, nor do the churches of God. (I Cor 11:4-5, 13-16)
Confer with the whole passage to get the full context.
So, what do we think of this? St Paul is appealling to 'nature' in his
argument, that it is natural that man ought not have his head covered
and woman ought to when praying, that this is parcel to being involved
in the 'churches of God.'
St Paul was writing in his time, of course. But, as 'Divine Revelation,' his
appeal to what is natural comes with greater authority. After all, if he is
speaking as mere conduit of 'God's Divine Will,' then the 'nature' of things
is as permanent as God is. It's not merely a local custom, but the ineffable
word of God.
So, how do Biblical literalists deal with such an issue? I'm certain I've
seldom seen women with covered heads in their churches. And what of
men like myself who have a ponytail? St Paul would have me believe
that his is a 'natural disgrace.'
What do Biblical literalists have to say about this?
Nemesio