Originally posted by RJHindsThe point is it is obvious a long period of time passed for those layers to accumulate because an entire lake a hundred miles wide cannot evaporate in a few months. It happened time after time after time and maybe a billion years ago.
Well, you have nothing to prove your point.
Originally posted by sonhouseThat is only speculation since you were not there to see it; and a lot of things can happen in 6000 years.
The point is it is obvious a long period of time passed for those layers to accumulate because an entire lake a hundred miles wide cannot evaporate in a few months. It happened time after time after time and maybe a billion years ago.
Originally posted by sonhouseNo I am not delusional about it. I admit that we just don't know what exactly happened on Mars or how long it took. All the scientists can do is speculate since none of them were there to observe it happening.
So your delusion extends even to obvious long term events on Mars. I don't really give a crap any more. Take your delusions and stuff them up your brain.
4 edits
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemYou can only play that game with delusional people so long before the bruises on your forehead get noticeable.
What took you so long? 😕
He is the kind of person, if you put him on a time machine up a thousand miles high and seeing the Earth go by in time at a rate of ten years per second and watch that for 3 hours, land 200,000 years ago, Neathertals outside the door, he would just call it a trick by the devil.
Originally posted by sonhouseWell, it would be, because there is no time machine that can do that. 😏
You can only play that game with delusional people so long before the bruises on your forehead get noticeable.
He is the kind of person, if you put him on a time machine up a thousand miles high and seeing the Earth go by in time at a rate of ten years per second and watch that for 3 hours, land 200,000 years ago, Neathertals outside the door, he would just call it a trick by the devil.